Hyppolite
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
PALM BEACH COUNTY
|
Professional knowledgeable |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-10 | Legal testimony | Direct examination of a witness named Hyppolite regarding the electronic record-keeping policies ... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Filing date of the court document containing the testimony of Hyppolite. | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Direct examination of witness Hyppolite regarding Palm Beach County student records. | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court adjournment for the evening. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-12-07 | N/A | Court Adjournment | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00016728.jpg
This is a single page (245 of 246) from a court transcript in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The text captures the very end of a session involving the direct examination of a witness named Hyppolite. The presiding judge adjourns the court to December 17, 2021, at 8:45 a.m., noting that the 'charge' (jury instructions) will be given 'tomorrow.'
DOJ-OGR-00016727.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a procedural discussion in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Attorney Ms. Menninger expresses concern that the government's rebuttal might become a second closing argument and requests the court enforce a rule to limit its scope. In response, attorney Ms. Comey assures the judge that the rebuttal will be significantly shorter than the closing, adhering to the standard practice in the district, a position the court affirms.
DOJ-OGR-00016726.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue captures a procedural discussion between the Judge, Defense Attorney Ms. Sternheim, and Prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding the timing of the jury charge draft and estimates for closing arguments (summations). Ms. Sternheim makes a remark about the government getting 'two cracks' at closing arguments.
DOJ-OGR-00016725.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a conversation between a judge and two lawyers, Ms. Menninger and Ms. Comey. The discussion centers on procedural issues, specifically the potential need to docket an exhibit for an unavailable witness and the judge's refusal to act on a previously submitted letter because its application was unclear. The judge states that the item will only be docketed if it is used as a judicial document in the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00016724.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge and attorneys Comey, Pagliuca, and Menninger. The discussion covers logistical matters, including deadlines for a decision and a legal brief set for that evening. The judge also brings up a letter received the previous day from counsel for a potential defense witness, leading to confusion among the attorneys about who received it.
DOJ-OGR-00016723.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features a procedural discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), Defense attorneys (Mr. Pagliuca, Ms. Sternheim), and the Prosecution (Ms. Comey). The primary topic is whether the government intends to call a rebuttal witness; Ms. Comey indicates they are leaning against it but will decide by the next morning.
DOJ-OGR-00016722.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge and defense counsel (Menninger, Everdell, Sternheim) regarding the trial schedule, specifically aiming to finish witness testimony by the following morning to allow for closing arguments and jury instructions on Monday. The court also mentions a pending motion to preclude and a previous ruling on anonymity.
DOJ-OGR-00016720.jpg
This is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Counsel for the government, Ms. Comey, offers to stipulate to the testimony of a witness named Hyppolite, which opposing counsel, Ms. Menninger, agrees to discuss. The judge then instructs both parties to confer and identify all remaining issues in dispute by 7:30.
DOJ-OGR-00016719.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. A witness named Hyppolite is testifying about searching for student records in the Palm Beach County school system at the request of the defense/prosecution. The proceedings are interrupted by the judge at 4:59 PM to adjourn for the evening.
DOJ-OGR-00016718.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Hyppolite. The testimony focuses on the Palm Beach County School District's electronic record retention policies, revealing that records for regular students are kept for three years after withdrawal, while records for exceptional education students are kept for five years. The witness confirms these records are electronically searchable, even for students who attended in the 1990s and early 2000s.
DOJ-OGR-00016717.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Hyppolite. The testimony focuses on the procedural handling of student records within the Palm Beach County School District, detailing how records transfer from elementary to middle to high school and are eventually archived at the district level. The document is stamped with DOJ-OGR-00016717.
Student record retention policies of the Palm Beach Count...
An unnamed questioner interrogates the witness, Hyppolite, about the Palm Beach County School District's procedures for maintaining, searching, and purging electronic student records.
Student files search
Questioning regarding the search for student files related to the case and district record keeping.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity