DOJ-OGR-00020975.jpg

642 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court order / legal opinion (page 32 of 40 from case 1:20-cr-00330-ajn)
File Size: 642 KB
Summary

This document is page 32 of a 40-page court order filed on April 1, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text discusses the legal standard for 'implied bias' regarding jurors, specifically rejecting the argument that a juror must be presumed biased simply for having personal experiences similar to the issues at trial. The court cites Second Circuit precedents (Daugerdas, Torres, Brown, Garcia) to support the conclusion that implied bias is a narrow category reserved for extreme situations, such as deliberate lying to get on a jury, rather than merely shared experiences.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Referenced as 'The Defendant' and in citations 'Maxwell Br.' and 'Maxwell Post-Hearing Br.'.
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Implied by case number suffix 'AJN'.
Juror (Unnamed) Juror
Subject of the legal discussion regarding implied bias and personal experiences similar to issues at trial.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Second Circuit Court of Appeals
Referenced as the controlling legal authority ('The Second Circuit has made clear...').
District Court
Referenced in relation to the Daugerdas opinion.
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Indicated by the footer stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-04-01
Filing of Document 653 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.
Court
The Court Ghislaine Maxwell
Unknown
Maxwell Post-Hearing
Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
Cited in legal precedent (D. Mass. 2011).

Relationships (1)

Ghislaine Maxwell Litigation The Court
The Court is ruling on arguments presented in 'Maxwell Br.' and 'Maxwell Post-Hearing Br.'

Key Quotes (5)

"The Court is unpersuaded."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020975.jpg
Quote #1
"First, the Second Circuit has not held that bias must be implied when a juror has a personal experience similar to the issues at trial."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020975.jpg
Quote #2
"The Second Circuit has made clear that implied bias is an intentionally narrow category."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020975.jpg
Quote #3
"implied bias because of that juror’s “brazen[],” “deliberate,” and “repeated lies” and creation of “a totally fictitious persona in her drive to get on the jury.”"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020975.jpg
Quote #4
"“[s]uch cases are unlikely to present the ‘extreme situations’ that call for mandatory"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020975.jpg
Quote #5

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document