DOJ-OGR-00002248.jpg

692 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court order / legal opinion (pretrial detention ruling)
File Size: 692 KB
Summary

This document is page 16 of a court order filed on December 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Court denies the Defendant's request for release, citing a 'lack of candor' and 'woefully incomplete' financial representations made to Pretrial Services. Consequently, the Court concludes the Defendant remains a flight risk and rejects the proposed $28.5 million bail package.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Defendant Defendant
Subject of the detention hearing; accused of lack of candor and misrepresenting facts regarding finances.
Spouse Family Member
Mentioned regarding privacy concerns and as a co-signer for the proposed bond.
The Court Judicial Body
The entity issuing the ruling denying bail.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Pretrial Services
Agency to which the Defendant allegedly made incomplete representations.
The Government
Prosecution; met the burden of persuasion regarding flight risk.
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (2 events)

2020-12-30
Court filing of Document 106 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.
Court (SDNY implied by case number)
Court Defendant Government
July 2020
Previous timeframe referenced regarding the Defendant's candor.
Court

Relationships (2)

Defendant Marriage/Financial Spouse
Reference to 'her spouse's privacy' and bond 'co-signed by the Defendant and her spouse'.
Defendant Legal/Supervisory Pretrial Services
Defendant made representations to Pretrial Services.

Key Quotes (3)

"In sum, the evidence of a lack of candor is, if anything, stronger now than in July 2020, as it is clear to the Court that the Defendant’s representations to Pretrial Services were woefully incomplete."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002248.jpg
Quote #1
"That lack of candor raises significant concerns as to whether the Court has now been provided a full and accurate picture of her finances and as to the Defendant’s willingness to abide by any set of conditions of release."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002248.jpg
Quote #2
"Thus, the Court’s original conclusion that the Defendant poses a flight risk and that no set of conditions can reasonably assure her future appearance remains unaltered."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002248.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document