| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Financial |
11
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Spousal |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Financial |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Marriage |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Financial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Married |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Thomas MacAulay Millar
|
Spousal |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Friend |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Spousal |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Marriage |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Marriage |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Spousal |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Spousal marital |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Spousal married |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Marriage |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
SUBJECT
|
Spousal |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Change in circumstance leading to decision not to divorce (context heavily redacted). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Large family event hosted by Ghislaine and her husband | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussions regarding divorce between Maxwell and spouse. | Unknown | View |
| 2018-01-01 | N/A | Defendant and spouse established a trust account and listed marital status as 'single' on bank fo... | Unknown | View |
| 2018-01-01 | N/A | Defendant and spouse established a trust account and listed marital status as 'single'. | Unknown | View |
| 2018-01-01 | N/A | Establishment of a trust account and falsification of marital status on forms | Bank | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Commencement of filing joint U.S. tax returns. | USA | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Marriage of Ghislaine Maxwell. | Unknown | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell married her spouse and began filing joint US tax returns. | N/A | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Financial transaction | Ms. Maxwell transferred the majority of her assets into a trust controlled by her spouse. | N/A | View |
| 2015-01-01 | N/A | Transfer of assets from defendant to spouse via trusts. | N/A | View |
This document is page 2 of a court order filed on March 22, 2021 (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), denying the Defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell, implied) third motion for release on bail. The Court rejects new proposals, including renouncing French and British citizenship and asset monitoring, citing continued flight risk, substantial resources, and foreign ties. It references previous denials from July and December 2020 and confirms her continued incarceration at the Metropolitan Detention Center.
This document is page 5 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated February 23, 2021, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The text outlines that Maxwell has renounced her foreign citizenship (France/UK) to address extradition concerns and proposes a strict asset monitoring system where all liquid assets belonging to her and her spouse will be moved to a 'New Account' overseen by a court-appointed monitor. This is intended to mitigate the Court's fear that her wealth could be used to facilitate flight.
This document is the introduction to Ghislaine Maxwell's memorandum supporting her third motion for bail, filed on February 23, 2021. In it, she proposes two new conditions to secure her release: renouncing her French and British citizenships to prevent extradition issues, and placing her and her spouse's assets into a monitored account overseen by a retired federal judge. She argues these measures address the Court's previous concerns about flight risk and extradition.
This document is page 14 of a court order regarding a bail motion for a Defendant (identified by case number as Ghislaine Maxwell). The text analyzes the Defendant's flight risk in relation to her family ties, specifically discussing a letter of support from her spouse whose identity was initially withheld. The Court notes that while the spouse describes a 'quiet family life,' the Defendant was not living with him at the time of arrest, claimed to be getting divorced, and does not propose living with him if released, which undermines her argument that the marriage prevents flight.
This is page 6 of a legal defense filing (Reply Memorandum) dated December 28, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues against the government's claim that Maxwell is hiding assets to prepare for flight, stating that her transfers to her spouse were disclosed on tax returns and that her asset estimates from jail were accurate given the circumstances. The document details financial specifics, including a London property used for loans and $4 million controlled by her spouse, with specific details regarding the spouse's assets redacted.
This document is the Table of Contents for a legal filing (likely a reply brief in support of a bail motion) filed on December 23, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the government's case is weak (relying on only three witnesses), that Maxwell has substantial ties to the US (including a spouse whose name is redacted), that she has disclosed all finances for bond, and that the COVID surge at the MDC justifies her release. It also refutes the claim that she is a flight risk or that extradition from France or the UK would be refused.
This document is the preliminary statement of a legal memorandum filed on December 14, 2020, supporting Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. It outlines new information not present at her initial hearing, including details on family ties in the US, a financial report covering her and her spouse, extradition waivers for the UK and France, and arguments against flight risk. Maxwell asserts her innocence, claims the government's case relies on uncorroborated testimony from 25 years ago, and requests release to prepare her defense.
This page from a legal filing (dated April 1, 2021) argues for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bond. The defense asserts she is not a flight risk because she voluntarily stayed in the U.S. to fight 'bogus charges.' To alleviate concerns about her wealth and foreign ties, the filing states she has agreed to renounce her British and French citizenships and place all her and her spouse's assets into an account monitored by a retired federal judge.
This is a page from a legal filing dated April 1, 2021, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The text details a proposed bail package valued at over $28.5 million, including $22.5 million in personal/spousal assets, $5 million from friends/family, and a $1 million bond from a security company. The defense argues that Maxwell has no intention of fleeing and is willing to renounce her British and French citizenship to prove it.
This document is Page 2 of a Court Order filed on December 28, 2020 (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), denying the Defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) third motion for release on bail. The Court rejects new proposals, including renouncing French and British citizenship and placing assets in a monitored account, reaffirming that she remains a flight risk with substantial resources and foreign ties. It references previous denials from July and December 2020 and notes her continued incarceration at the Metropolitan Detention Center.
This document is page 16 of a court order filed on December 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Court denies the Defendant's request for release, citing a 'lack of candor' and 'woefully incomplete' financial representations made to Pretrial Services. Consequently, the Court concludes the Defendant remains a flight risk and rejects the proposed $28.5 million bail package.
This document is page 15 of a court filing (Document 106) from December 30, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text argues for continued detention, citing Maxwell's lack of employment ties to the US, significant ties abroad, and a pattern of providing incomplete financial information to Pretrial Services, specifically underreporting assets by omitting spousal assets and trust accounts in July 2020. It references a financial report prepared by the accounting firm Macalvins and disputes Maxwell's defense that her financial misrepresentations were due to lack of access to records while detained.
This document is page 5 of a legal filing (Document 106) from December 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It details the Defendant's new motion for bail, proposing a $28.5 million package co-signed by her spouse, friends, and family, secured by property and cash. The proposal includes home confinement with GPS monitoring, private security paid for by the defendant, and a family member acting as a third-party custodian.
This page from a defense filing (dated Dec 23, 2020) argues that Ghislaine Maxwell accurately disclosed her assets to Pretrial Services despite being in jail without records. The defense rebuts the government's claim that she is hiding wealth or has 'unrestrained funds' to flee, citing a negative pledge on her London property and the illiquidity of $4 million controlled by her spouse.
This document is a Government filing from December 2020 opposing the defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) bail application. It argues she is a flight risk who has sophisticatedly hidden her wealth by transferring millions into trusts for her spouse over the preceding five years. The text highlights a financial discrepancy where she brought over $20 million to the marriage while her spouse contributed only $200,000, and notes her 'lack of candor' with Pretrial Services regarding property ownership.
This page from a government filing (opposition to bail) argues that the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) is a flight risk. It highlights that her marriage is not a sufficient tie to the US, noting she lived alone while hiding in New Hampshire and that she and her spouse listed themselves as 'single' on bank trust account forms in 2018. The document also dismisses the defense's offer to waive extradition rights, particularly noting that France generally does not extradite its own nationals.
This document is a page from a forensic accounting report filed in the case US v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330). It details the finances of the Terramar Project (US and UK), noting Maxwell's contributions of over $560,000 and a $57,000 donation from the Epstein Interests Foundation in 2013. The report asserts Maxwell received no financial benefit from the charity and lists reviewed bank accounts belonging to Maxwell and her spouse, though the specific bank names are redacted.
This document is page 19 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on a $22.5 million bond. It details that her spouse is pledging all his assets (three properties worth ~$8 million) and that friends and family, including one individual pledging her entire $1.5 million retirement 'nest-egg', are acting as sureties. The text emphasizes the financial devastation these individuals would face if Maxwell fled, arguing this guarantees her compliance.
This document is page 11 of a court order filed on March 22, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Court denies the Defendant's motion for bail, citing that proposed conditions, including monitorship, cannot reasonably assure her appearance in court. The judge notes that despite a substantial bail package, the Defendant retains access to significant assets ($450,000 for living expenses plus valuable jewelry/chattels) that could facilitate flight and evasion of prosecution.
This is page 2 of a court order filed on March 22, 2021, in the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Court denies the defendant's third motion for release on bail, rejecting new proposals such as renouncing her French and British citizenship and placing spousal assets under the monitoring of a retired judge. The document reiterates that the defendant remains a flight risk and that government evidence remains strong.
This document is a page from a Government filing opposing the defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) bail application. It argues she is a flight risk who has sophisticatedly hidden her wealth by transferring millions of dollars to her spouse through trusts over the last five years, noting she brought over $20 million to the marriage while he brought only $200,000. The text highlights her lack of candor with Pretrial Services regarding her net worth and the ownership of her New Hampshire residence.
This legal document discusses the defendant's financial status and its implications for her bail conditions. It highlights that the defendant possesses significantly more assets ($22 million, including a $2 million London townhouse and over $4 million in unrestrained funds) than initially reported, making her a substantial flight risk. The document also raises concerns about the effectiveness of the proposed bail bond, noting that some co-signers are UK residents who haven't offered cash or property, and the defendant's $7 million attorney retainer is presumed unspent.
This page from a government filing (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) argues that the defendant is a flight risk. It highlights her time hiding in New Hampshire, her foreign ties to the UK and France, and the difficulty of extradition. A footnote reveals that in 2018, despite being married, both the defendant and her spouse listed their status as 'single' on bank trust account forms, which the government cites as evidence of a lack of candor.
This document is a page of jury instructions from a court case filed on October 22, 2021. It outlines the defendant's rights, including the presumption of innocence and the right not to testify, and clarifies that the government holds the burden of proof. The instructions strictly forbid jurors from consuming any media, conducting independent research (including on the internet), or discussing the case with anyone—including family, colleagues, and fellow jurors—until deliberations officially begin.
This document is page 15 of a legal order filed on December 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court argues against granting bail, citing Maxwell's lack of employment ties to the US, significant ties abroad, and a pattern of providing erroneous financial information to Pretrial Services, specifically underreporting her assets in July 2020 by omitting her spouse's assets and trust accounts.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Unknown | Spouse | $4,000,000.00 | Assets controlled by spouse, noted as difficult... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Spouse | N/A | $4,000,000.00 | Approximate amount controlled by spouse that co... | View |
| 2025-03-01 | Paid | Spouse | Marriage Assets | $200,000.00 | Amount brought to the marriage by the husband. | View |
| 2025-03-01 | Paid | Spouse | Marriage Assets | $200,000.00 | Amount the husband brought to the marriage. | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Received | Buyers of Hovensa... | Spouse | $400,000.00 | Amount retained by spouse for living and other ... | View |
| 2021-02-23 | Received | Spouse's Personal... | Spouse | $450,000.00 | Approximate amount in Personal Account reserved... | View |
| 2020-12-23 | Received | Unknown | Spouse | $0.00 | Spouse liquidated existing investments to help ... | View |
| 2020-12-14 | Paid | Spouse | Court/Government | $8,000,000.00 | Approximate value of three properties owned by ... | View |
| 2015-01-01 | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Spouse | $0.00 | Millions of dollars in cash transferred to her ... | View |
| 2015-01-01 | Received | defendant | Spouse | $0.00 | Millions of dollars of assets transferred throu... | View |
| 2015-01-01 | Received | defendant | Spouse | $0.00 | Millions of dollars of assets transferred throu... | View |
| 2013-01-01 | Paid | Spouse | Noncitizen Spouse | $143,000.00 | Annual exclusion from gift taxes for gifts made... | View |
Expounds on the lives led before arrest, describing a 'quiet family life'.
Explains why he did not co-sign initially (media aggression) and offers full support now.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity