DOJ-OGR-00002752.jpg
1.2 MB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
5
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
7
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
1.2 MB
Summary
This legal document is a court filing arguing against a defendant's proposed bail package. The prosecution contends that the defendant's offer to renounce her foreign citizenships (French and British) does not sufficiently mitigate the risk of her fleeing the country. The document argues the renunciation's validity is unclear and could be challenged later, and it cites a previous case (United States v. Cohen) where similar offers were deemed insufficient to assure the court that the defendant was not a flight risk.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The defendant | defendant |
The subject of the legal filing, who has offered to renounce her foreign citizenship as part of a proposed bail package.
|
| Cohen | Defendant |
Mentioned in a cited case, United States v. Cohen, where the defendant also made offers to renounce citizenship and w...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court | government agency |
The judicial body making bail determinations and being addressed in the motion.
|
| Government | government agency |
The prosecuting party in the case, which believes the defendant is a flight risk.
|
| Israeli embassy | government agency |
Mentioned in a quote from a cited case (United States v. Cohen) as an entity that could be instructed to deny documents.
|
Timeline (3 events)
The defendant offered to renounce her foreign citizenship as part of a proposed bail package.
Locations (5)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
A country where the defendant holds citizenship and could potentially seek refuge.
|
|
|
A country where the defendant holds citizenship and could potentially seek refuge.
|
|
|
The country where the legal proceedings are taking place and which may not have an extradition treaty with all other ...
|
|
|
Mentioned in the context of the cited case United States v. Cohen, where the defendant had Israeli citizenship.
|
|
|
Northern District of California, the court district for the cited case United States v. Cohen.
|
Relationships (2)
The defendant is subject to the Court's bail determinations and is making motions to the Court.
The Government is arguing against the defendant's motion for a new bail package, asserting she is a flight risk.
Key Quotes (7)
"if the Court so requires."Source
— The defendant
(The condition under which the defendant offers to renounce her foreign citizenship.)
DOJ-OGR-00002752.jpg
Quote #1
"eliminate any opportunity for her to seek refuge"Source
— The defendant
(A claim made by the defendant about the effect of renouncing her citizenship.)
DOJ-OGR-00002752.jpg
Quote #2
"remove[] any incentive the Court and government believe she may have to seek refuge in those countries."Source
— The defendant
(A claim from the defendant's motion regarding the effect of her offer.)
DOJ-OGR-00002752.jpg
Quote #3
"would be able to frustrate any extradition requests . . . weighs strongly in favor of detention"Source
— The Court
(A previous finding by the Court regarding the defendant's flight risk.)
DOJ-OGR-00002752.jpg
Quote #4
"of sound mind (unless it’s decided that it’s in your best interest)."Source
— www.gov.uk/renounce-british-nationality
(A requirement for renouncing British citizenship, which the document suggests the defendant could later contest.)
DOJ-OGR-00002752.jpg
Quote #5
"Defendant’s offers to turn in his passports, to ‘renounce’ his Israeli citizenship, and have someone ‘instruct’ the Israeli embassy to deny new documents or travel authorizations to defendant, as well as his offer to waive extradition—assuming he flees overseas at some point—do not sufficiently assure the Court that defendant is not still a flight risk."Source
— Court in United States v. Cohen
(A quote from a cited case used as precedent to argue against the defendant's current offer.)
DOJ-OGR-00002752.jpg
Quote #6
"little weight"Source
— The Court
(The amount of consideration the Court placed on the defendant's argument in the Second Bail Motion regarding the waiver of appeal rights for an extradition order.)
DOJ-OGR-00002752.jpg
Quote #7
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document