HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015627.jpg
1.78 MB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (court motion response)
File Size:
1.78 MB
Summary
This document is page 7 of a response in the case Edwards v. Dershowitz (CACE 15-000072). It details discovery disputes between victims' counsel (Edwards and Cassell) and the Government regarding the production of documents and the attempt to add Virginia Giuffre (Jane Doe No. 3) to the case in 2014. The text highlights the Government's delay tactics and eventual refusal to stipulate the addition of new victims.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley Edwards | Attorney/Plaintiff |
Listed in case title; counsel for victims pressing the Government for stipulations.
|
| Alan Dershowitz | Defendant |
Listed in case title as opposing party.
|
| Paul Cassell | Attorney |
Co-counsel with Edwards; contacted Government counsel regarding adding victims.
|
| Virginia Giuffre | Victim |
Identified as 'Jane Doe No. 3'; Edwards and Cassell sought to add her to the case.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Refers to US Federal Prosecutors/Government counsel involved in discovery disputes.
|
|
| The Court |
Judicial body overseeing the case and issuing rulings.
|
Timeline (2 events)
June 2013
Summer 2014
Edwards and Cassell request to add Virginia Giuffre (Jane Doe No. 3) to the case.
N/A
Relationships (2)
Referred to jointly as 'Edwards and Cassell' acting on behalf of victims.
Edwards sought to add her to the case as a victim.
Key Quotes (3)
"The Government then produced about 1,500 pages of largely irrelevant materials to the victims... while simultaneously submitting 14,825 pages of relevant materials under seal to the Court."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015627.jpg
Quote #1
"Edwards and Cassell sought to have her added to the case via stipulation, which would have avoided the need to include any detailed facts about her abuse."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015627.jpg
Quote #2
"“Our position is that we oppose adding new petitioners at this stage of the litigation.”"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015627.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document