Virginia Giuffre
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim abuser |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Paul Cassell
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Trafficker victim |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Emmy
|
Friend |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Senator George Mitchell
|
Alleged abuse |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Recruiter victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ghislaine Maxwell
|
Victim recruiter |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Ghislaine Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Prince Andrew
|
Accused accuser |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Victim defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Accuser accused |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Accused accuser |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abusive exploitative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
T.J.
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | 23 flights on Epstein’s private jet involving Ghislaine Maxwell and a teenaged Ms. Giuffre | Epstein's private jet | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual Abuse | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Recruitment of Virginia as a teenager to travel with Maxwell and Epstein. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Litigation filed against Ms. Maxwell regarding defamation/lying about the victim's story. | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual trafficking and abuse of Giuffre while she was a minor. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Motion to Compel the Production of Documents and Testimony | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Recruitment and initial abuse of Virginia Giuffre. | Mar-a-Lago, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defamation action dismissed | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Photographs taken of Virginia Giuffre, Prince Andrew, and the Defendant | Defendant’s London townhome | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dinner and Dancing at Tramp Nightclub | London (Restaurant and Tram... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Taking of the Photograph | Ghislaine's Townhouse (upst... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual Encounter / Bath | Ghislaine's Townhouse (Bath... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Virginia Giuffre met Ghislaine Maxwell at age 15 | Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | First sexual activity with Epstein | Epstein's home (Palm Beach) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trip to New York City | New York City | View |
| N/A | N/A | Edwards and Cassell request to add Virginia Giuffre (Jane Doe No. 3) to the case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged sighting of Bill Clinton on Epstein's Island | United States Virgin Islands | View |
| N/A | N/A | Aftermath of massage/sexual encounter; Jeffrey asks to be dried off; payment is made downstairs. | Epstein Residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Car ride to work; Narrator lies to father about well-being. | Car / Mar-A-Lago Parking Lot | View |
| N/A | N/A | Return to Epstein's house; admitted by Juan; meets Emmy in kitchen. | Epstein Residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Giuffre v. Maxwell unseal proceedings | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged trafficking of Virginia Giuffre by Jeffrey Epstein to Dershowitz and Prince Andrew. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | Meeting | Ghislaine Maxwell spotted Virginia Giuffre at the Mar-a-Lago Hotel and procured her for Jeffrey E... | Mar-a-Lago Hotel, Florida | View |
| N/A | Abuse | Virginia Giuffre was abused by Ghislaine Maxwell from age 16 to 19. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Parties in the civil defamation case signed a confidential settlement agreement after about two y... | Unknown | View |
055.pdf
A letter from Fordham Law Professor Bruce A. Green to Judge Richard Berman clarifying the record regarding a previous court hearing. Green asserts that contrary to comments made in court, he has never served as legal counsel for Jeffrey Epstein or his estate, although he did serve as an expert witness for Alan Dershowitz in a separate defamation case (Giuffre v. Dershowitz).
010.pdf
This document is a letter from Maria Farmer's legal counsel to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald opposing Alan Dershowitz's motion to intervene in the case *Farmer v. Indyke et al.*. Dershowitz sought to intervene to strike Paragraph 39 of Farmer's complaint, which alleges that Farmer, while working at Epstein's NY mansion, saw Dershowitz go upstairs while young girls were present. The letter argues that Dershowitz has no right to intervene, that the allegations are relevant to the sex-trafficking conspiracy and Farmer's silence, and that the motion to strike is meritless.
009.pdf
This document is a letter from Alan Dershowitz's legal counsel to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald requesting a pre-motion conference to intervene in the civil case 'Maria Farmer v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein'. Dershowitz seeks to strike paragraph 39 of Farmer's complaint, which alleges she saw him at Epstein's New York mansion going upstairs with young girls brought by Ghislaine Maxwell. Dershowitz argues this allegation is demonstrably false based on chronology (claiming he didn't meet Epstein until after Farmer left) and is legally irrelevant to the estate case, serving only to defame him.
037.pdf
This court document from April 7, 2017, details a 'Notice of Submission of Witness Solicitation Materials' filed in the case of Bradley J. Edwards v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre submitted witness solicitation materials for in camera review as per a March 23, 2017, court ruling. The document also includes a certificate of service, confirming electronic filing and service to attorneys Laura A. Menninger and Jeffrey S. Pagliuca.
034.pdf
A letter motion filed on March 14, 2017, by attorney Paul G. Cassell to Judge Robert W. Sweet in the case Giuffre v. Maxwell. Cassell requests a one-week continuance for a hearing regarding a Motion to Quash a subpoena served on his client, Bradley J. Edwards, citing a scheduled medical procedure preventing him from traveling to New York. The opposing counsel is noted as having agreed to reschedule the hearing to March 23, 2017.
033.pdf
This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by attorney Bradley J. Edwards in support of his motion to quash a subpoena served on him by Ghislaine Maxwell. Edwards argues that Maxwell's requests for his communications with 'prospective witnesses' are overbroad, unduly burdensome, and seek protected attorney work-product. The filing notably alleges that Maxwell has failed to explain her presence on 23 flights with a teenaged Virginia Giuffre or the message pads documenting underage girls calling Epstein's mansion for 'massages'.
013-02.pdf
This document is a Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed on April 8, 2016, in a Florida Circuit Court case between Bradley J. Edwards/Paul G. Cassell and Alan M. Dershowitz. The plaintiffs withdraw their motion pursuant to a confidential settlement agreement but explicitly state that their client, Virginia Giuffre, reaffirms her allegations and that the withdrawal is not an admission that her allegations were mistaken. They concede that filing certain allegations in a separate Crime Victims' Rights Act case was a 'tactical mistake' that caused distractions.
001-03.pdf
This document is a subpoena issued by the US District Court (SDNY) on behalf of Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell to attorney Bradley J. Edwards in May 2016. It demands the production of various documents, including those related to previous litigation involving Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz, communications with journalist Sharon Churcher, and records regarding the organization 'Victims Refuse Silence, Inc.' A check for $45.00 payable to Edwards is included, likely as a witness fee.
EFTA00030155.pdf
Internal DOJ/SDNY email thread dated June 19, 2019, circulating a Law360 article about Alan Dershowitz's legal bid to disqualify the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner from representing his accuser, Virginia Giuffre. The article details the conflict of interest allegations stemming from a 2015 interaction between Dershowitz and Boies Schiller partner Carlos Sires, and notes Judge Preska's decision to consider the motion. The email discussion confirms that the DOJ press office had not received inquiries from reporters about the case.
EFTA00026703.pdf
This document is an email from June 2019 forwarding a Law360 article about the legal battle between Alan Dershowitz and the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. The article details Dershowitz's attempt to disqualify the firm from representing his accuser, Virginia Giuffre, citing a conflict of interest stemming from a 2015 interaction with partner Carlos Sires. U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska ruled that Dershowitz could pursue the disqualification bid, reinstating a motion she had previously removed for procedural reasons.
EFTA00020697.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 15, 2019, between Peter Skinner (likely representing Boies Schiller Flexner) and a redacted sender (likely a federal prosecutor). The correspondence concerns a Grand Jury subpoena served on BSF regarding the 'Guiffre v. Maxwell' civil case. The redacted sender provides a sealed order granting BSF permission to turn over 'CONFIDENTIAL' discovery materials to the Grand Jury, while explicitly noting this order does not apply to the 'Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein' litigation.
EFTA00011026.pdf
Judge Richard M. Berman writes to Professor Bruce A. Green regarding Green's recent Law Journal opinion piece which criticized the court's handling of the Epstein dismissal hearing. Judge Berman notes a potential undisclosed conflict of interest, revealing that Green had been retained as an ethics expert in a related civil case (Giuffre v. Dershowitz) to argue for the disqualification of David Boies, the attorney representing the victims whose speaking rights Green criticized in his article.
DOJ-OGR-00015106.jpg
This document is a legal filing (page 4 of an internal document, page 11 of the court filing) arguing for the unsealing of grand jury transcripts with specific conditions. The filing argues that while victim identities (such as Ms. Farmer) must be redacted to protect their privacy and psychological wellbeing, the Court should not 'rubber stamp' redactions for third-party affiliates of Epstein and Maxwell who have not been charged, suggesting such broad redactions would resemble a cover-up. It cites multiple legal precedents regarding privacy interests in sexual abuse cases, including *Giuffre v. Maxwell* and *Doe 1 v. JP Morgan Chase Bank*.
DOJ-OGR-00015080.jpg
This is a legal filing (Page 2 of 4) dated August 4, 2025, submitted by the Government to Judges Berman and Engelmayer regarding the unsealing of documents in the Epstein and Maxwell cases. The Government addresses Court orders requiring them to identify specific grand jury exhibits and transcripts for public release, noting that trial exhibits are presumptively public. The Government requests an extension until August 8, 2025, to advise the Court on its position regarding the unsealing of grand jury exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00008301.jpg
This is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 9, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government is requesting permission to redact a letter motion concerning the admission of Government Exhibit 52 and to seal or redact Exhibits A and B to protect the privacy of minor victims, witnesses, and third parties.
DOJ-OGR-00008292.jpg
This page is a transcript from a deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell (filed in court on Dec 9, 2021). Maxwell is being questioned about a specific document bearing the Bates label 'Giuffre 001663' which contains a section titled 'Massage Florida.' Maxwell denies recollection of the document being on her computer, denies creating it, and claims not to know who did create it. Her attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, objects to the line of questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00001755.jpg
This is a page from a legal filing dated August 17, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The document discusses the government's ex parte applications dating back to February 2019, Maxwell's arrest on July 2, 2020, and the superseding indictment filed on July 8, 2020, which alleges she facilitated Epstein's abuse of minors and committed perjury in 2016. A footnote details the timeline of discovery materials being transferred to the defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00021068.jpg
This document, dated February 28, 2023, appears to be a legal filing summarizing trial testimony against Ghislaine Maxwell. It highlights inconsistencies between trial testimony and pre-trial statements made by accusers 'Jane' and 'Carolyn' regarding Maxwell's presence and involvement in sexual abuse. Specifically, it notes that Carolyn did not mention Maxwell in 2007 FBI interviews or a 2008 lawsuit, despite implicating her at trial.
DOJ-OGR-00020881.jpg
This document is a news article from DailyMail.Online detailing an interview with 'Scotty,' a juror from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Scotty discusses the jury's deliberations, their negative reaction to the defense's aggressive tactics towards victims, and the overwhelming complexity of the 80-page jury instructions. A sidebar article reports on a separate legal issue, describing a 'brutal' court hearing for Prince Andrew in New York for a sexual abuse lawsuit, where a judge appeared unreceptive to his lawyers' arguments to dismiss the case.
DOJ-OGR-00020724.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York covering proceedings related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell in late June 2022. It records Judge Nathan's orders permitting specific victims (Annie Farmer, Kate, Virginia Giuffre, Sarah Ransome, Teresa Helm, and Elizabeth Stein) to read oral statements at sentencing, noting that Giuffre's counsel would read hers due to a medical issue preventing Giuffre's physical presence. The document also records the sentencing hearing held on June 28, 2022, listing the attorneys present for both the defense and the prosecution, and grants a motion by the NY Times Company to unseal juror questionnaires.
DOJ-OGR-00020722.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from June 22 to June 24, 2022. It details the procedural skirmishes leading up to sentencing, specifically regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the admissibility of victim impact statements. The judge orders the inclusion of statements from seven individuals, explicitly naming Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre, while denying defense requests for redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00020577.jpg
This document is a court docket page from June 2022 detailing the final proceedings leading up to and including the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It records orders permitting specific victims (including Virginia Giuffre and Annie Farmer) to present impact statements, notes Giuffre's absence due to medical issues, and confirms the sentencing hearing took place on June 28, 2022. It also includes an order granting the NY Times' motion to unseal juror questionnaires.
DOJ-OGR-00020476.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from June 2022 covering the sentencing phase of US v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details orders permitting specific victims (including Virginia Giuffre, Annie Farmer, and 'Kate') to provide impact statements, notes Giuffre's medical inability to attend in person, records the sentencing hearing held on June 28, 2022, and grants a motion by the NY Times to unseal juror questionnaires.
DOJ-OGR-00020475.jpg
This document is a court docket log from June 24-26, 2022, relating to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426). It details Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders permitting victims Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre to make in-person statements at sentencing. The docket also records communications regarding Maxwell's access to legal materials at the MDC, defense motions regarding victim impact statements from Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, and the denial of Maxwell's request to redact victim statements.
DOJ-OGR-00002417.jpg
This document is page 8 of a defense filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated February 4, 2021, arguing that Virginia Giuffre's defamation claims against Ghislaine Maxwell were based on lies and that Giuffre attempted to shift the focus to being 'sexually trafficked' by Epstein to third parties. It details the legal history of Maxwell's depositions and a protective order granted to shield confidential information from a 'media circus.' A footnote references a concurrent lawsuit between Giuffre and Alan Dershowitz, noting Dershowitz filed evidence suggesting Giuffre and her lawyers fabricated stories.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Virginia Giuffre | $0.00 | Payment for the trip and 'showing his friend, t... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Virginia Giuffre | $0.00 | Paid extremely well, money used for pills and a... | View |
| 2025-11-13 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Virginia Giuffre | $0.00 | Jeffrey stopped paying the narrator's 'expensiv... | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Virginia Giuffre | $30,000,000.00 | Plaintiff's alleged request for damages in the ... | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Virginia Giuffre | $5,000,000.00 | Plaintiff's alleged claim for lost wages. | View |
| 2015-09-21 | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Virginia Giuffre | $75,000.00 | Jurisdictional requirement for damages requeste... | View |
| 2001-01-01 | Received | Media Sources | Virginia Giuffre | $500,000.00 | Defense counsel alleges plaintiff admitted to b... | View |
Summons
Request to meet them in Jeffrey's study.
Dismissal
I'll call you next time I'm in town
Recollection of Bill Clinton
Stated recollection of witnessing Bill Clinton on Epstein's island.
Invitation to Epstein's mansion
Maxwell asked that Giuffre come with her to Jeffrey Epstein’s mansion for the purposes of teaching her how to perform 'massages'.
Introduction
Emmy introduces herself as Ghislaine's PA; Narrator introduces herself as 'Jenna'.
Employment
Ghislaine tells narrator she has potential as a massage therapist and asks to see her again the next day.
Cancellation
Canceling the meeting because Jeffrey demanded a massage.
Sexual crimes committed against her
Contains highly sensitive information about experiences as a minor.
Meeting at airport
Arranging a pickup/meeting.
Instruction
Told her to go to 'Rick's' room for a massage and come back to his room after.
Instruction
Whispered that the man she danced with was a prince.
Victim impact statement
A statement written by Virginia Giuffre and read by her counsel in court, directly addressing Ghislaine Maxwell. It accuses Maxwell of procuring her for Jeffrey Epstein at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 and participating in her sexual, physical, and emotional abuse.
Criminal Investigation
Judge rules plaintiff's own statements to law enforcement must be submitted in camera.
Unknown
Defense claims plaintiff produced only two emails despite 200 search terms; Plaintiff claims full compliance.
Interview regarding Epstein and Maxwell
Giuffre provided truthful and accurate information to the FBI about Epstein and Maxwell’s sexual abuse.
Sexual contact allegations
Dershowitz claims this conversation is alleged to have happened secretly, but denies its truth.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity