DOJ-OGR-00005495.jpg
719 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal court filing (defense motion/memorandum)
File Size:
719 KB
Summary
This page is from a legal filing (Document 382) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 29, 2021. It presents a legal argument citing case law (Kyles v. Whitley, Bowen v. Maynard) to support the admissibility of evidence regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), prior charging decisions, and the death of Jeffrey Epstein. The defense argues these elements are necessary to challenge the thoroughness and good faith of the government's investigation.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
The subject of the legal argument; the defense seeks to allow her to challenge the thoroughness of the investigation.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Associate/Deceased |
His death, prior charging decisions, and the NPA are cited as relevant evidence.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court |
Referenced in legal citations (Kyles v. Whitley).
|
|
| 10th Cir. |
Court of Appeals referenced in legal citations (Bowen v. Maynard).
|
|
| 5th Cir. |
Court of Appeals referenced in legal citations (Lindsey v. King).
|
|
| Government |
The prosecution; the entity whose investigation is being challenged.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (inferred from Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (3 events)
2021-10-29
Document 382 filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Court Record
Death of Jeffrey Epstein
Prior Charging Decisions
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the investigation being challenged.
|
Relationships (1)
The document argues that Epstein's NPA and death are relevant to Maxwell's defense.
Key Quotes (3)
"Evidence and Argument About the NPA, Prior Charging Decisions, and the Death of Jeffrey Epstein Is Admissible to Challenge the Thoroughness and Good Faith of the New York Investigation"Source
DOJ-OGR-00005495.jpg
Quote #1
"The Supreme Court has recognized that it is entirely proper for the defense to explore and challenge 'the thoroughness and even the good faith of the [government’s] investigation.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00005495.jpg
Quote #2
"Here, the NPA, the government’s prior charging decisions, and the death of Jeffrey Epstein are all relevant and admissible to allow Ms. Maxwell to challenge the 'thoroughness'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00005495.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document