DOJ-OGR-00009846.jpg
791 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
791 KB
Summary
This legal document argues against the defendant's position that Juror 50's motion to intervene should be sealed. The author asserts that the motion is a judicial document that should be publicly docketed, citing the case Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga and refuting the defendant's claims that it is merely a discovery request or that public filing would interfere with testimony. A footnote defends the Government's prior action of publicly filing a letter about Juror 50's public statements, stating it was appropriate and that an attempt was made to confer with defense counsel beforehand.
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Pyramid Co. of Onondaga | company |
Mentioned in the case citation 'Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga'.
|
| Government | government agency |
Mentioned in the footnote as the entity that publicly docketed a letter regarding Juror 50 and sought to confer with ...
|
| Court | government agency |
Referenced throughout as the judicial body that makes decisions, grants motions, and to whom Juror 50's statements we...
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the case citation 'Pyramid Co. of Onondaga'.
|
Relationships (2)
The defendant is challenging Juror 50's motion to intervene and arguing it should not be a public judicial document.
The Government sought to confer with the defense counsel before filing a letter but received no response, indicating a professional interaction within the context of litigation.
Key Quotes (3)
"different footing"Source
— unspecified
(Used to describe how a motion to invoke court powers differs from items passed in discovery.)
DOJ-OGR-00009846.jpg
Quote #1
"until a district court knows the disposition of the underlying motion, any attempt at calling something a judicial document is premature"Source
— 2d Cir. in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
(An argument rejected by the court in a cited case, used here to support the idea that Juror 50's motion is a judicial document regardless of the outcome.)
DOJ-OGR-00009846.jpg
Quote #2
"discovery request"Source
— defendant
(The defendant's characterization of Juror 50's motion, which the author argues is inaccurate.)
DOJ-OGR-00009846.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document