HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017341.jpg
1.53 MB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
4
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal statement / article draft / memorandum
File Size:
1.53 MB
Summary
This document appears to be a draft statement or article dated April 2, 2012, written by a defense attorney (contextually Alan Dershowitz) defending the legal strategy regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The text details the shift from a state-level plea deal to a federal investigation initiated by dissatisfied local police, and justifies the controversial non-prosecution agreement by characterizing the federal statutes as 'draconian' and disparaging the victims as willing participants in a 'business.' The author argues the client is not truly a sex offender and expresses doubt that a victim advocacy group's lawsuit to rescind the plea deal will succeed.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Narrator | Defense Attorney |
Author of the text; represented 'the man' in plea negotiations. (Contextually likely Alan Dershowitz based on the spe...
|
| The Man / My Client | Defendant |
Accused of sexual contact with underage girls; agreed to plea bargain. (Contextually Jeffrey Epstein).
|
| Local Prosecutor | Prosecutor |
Initial prosecutor with whom the narrator negotiated a 'no jail time' deal.
|
| Local Police | Law Enforcement |
Dissatisfied with the initial state resolution; referred the case to the US Attorney's Office.
|
| Alleged 'Victims' | Victims / Witnesses |
Underage girls involved in the case; described disparagingly by the narrator as 'anything but victims' who sought out...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Attorney's Office |
Federal prosecutors who took over the case after local police referral.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the document stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
|
| Unspecified Victim Advocacy Group |
Described as 'A group that brings lawsuits on behalf of the victims of sex crimes'; sued the federal government over ...
|
Timeline (4 events)
2008 (Contextual)
Final Plea Bargain / Sentencing
Federal/State Court
The Client
Federal Government
Post-sentencing
Lawsuit against Federal Government
Court
Victim Advocacy Group
Federal Government
Unspecified (Historical)
Initial plea bargain negotiation
State level (implied Florida)
Unspecified (Historical)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where the alleged crimes occurred (Contextually Florida).
|
|
|
Location where the client was called by victims and where he served house arrest.
|
Relationships (1)
whom I had known for several years, to help represent him in the matter
Key Quotes (5)
"the alleged 'victims' were anything but victims—they sought out my client and repeatedly called his house asking for more business."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017341.jpg
Quote #1
"register as a sex offender (which he really isn’t)."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017341.jpg
Quote #2
"Had my client been convicted under them, he could have received a sentence of 25 years for each separate massage."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017341.jpg
Quote #3
"We thought the case was over, until we learned that the local police were not satisfied with this resolution"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017341.jpg
Quote #4
"unusual plea bargain, under which the federal government would not prosecute him if he agreed to plead guilty to a state crime"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017341.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document