advocacy group

Organization
Mentions
6
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
3
Also known as:
Unspecified Victim Advocacy Group Justice Advocacy Group, LLC

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

EFTA00028003.pdf

This document is a legal declaration by Maureen P. Baird, a former BOP Warden, submitted to the Westminster Magistrates' Court for the extradition case of Julian Assange. Baird provides expert testimony on the harsh conditions of Special Administrative Measures (SAMs), the ADX Florence supermax prison, and Communication Management Units (CMUs). Significantly, she references the suicide of Jeffrey Epstein at MCC New York (where she was formerly Warden) multiple times to illustrate the failure of BOP suicide prevention protocols, noting specifically that cameras malfunction and self-reporting is unreliable.

Legal declaration / expert witness statement
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00015001.jpg

This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding, specifically the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio, filed on January 15, 2025. The questioning centers on a study about "predatory alienation," a term the questioner asserts was created by an advocacy group. Rocchio clarifies that the study is qualitative rather than subjective, while the questioner probes its methodology and origins.

Legal document
2025-11-20

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017341.jpg

This document appears to be a draft statement or article dated April 2, 2012, written by a defense attorney (contextually Alan Dershowitz) defending the legal strategy regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The text details the shift from a state-level plea deal to a federal investigation initiated by dissatisfied local police, and justifies the controversial non-prosecution agreement by characterizing the federal statutes as 'draconian' and disparaging the victims as willing participants in a 'business.' The author argues the client is not truly a sex offender and expresses doubt that a victim advocacy group's lawsuit to rescind the plea deal will succeed.

Legal statement / article draft / memorandum
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity