DOJ-OGR-00019296.jpg

445 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

1
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
0
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 445 KB
Summary

This legal document, part of Case 20-3061 dated September 10, 2020, argues for the consolidation of legal cases. The author contends that having separate panels for criminal and civil cases creates an unfair situation, and cites inconsistent rulings from judges in the Southern District of New York as having prejudiced Ms. Maxwell.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Ms. Maxwell Party in legal case
Mentioned as being prejudiced by inconsistent results from the court.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Court Judicial body
Referred to as having two panels on equal judicial footing and supervisory jurisdiction.
Southern District of New York Court / Government agency
A court over which another court has supervisory jurisdiction, and whose judges have allegedly reached inconsistent r...

Timeline (2 events)

A judicial panel is hearing a criminal case.
A separate judicial panel is hearing a civil case.

Locations (1)

Location Context
The location of the court whose judges are mentioned.

Key Quotes (1)

"The judges of that court, however, have reached inconsistent results to the prejudice of Ms. Maxwell."
Source
— Author of the document (This statement is used to argue for the consolidation of cases to ensure fair and consistent treatment.)
DOJ-OGR-00019296.jpg
Quote #1

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document