DOJ-OGR-00013975.jpg

644 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

1
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 644 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Loftus. Loftus discusses the ethical review process for psychological experiments on humans, explaining how the requirement to 'cause no harm' limits the scope of research, particularly in studies on false memories. Loftus provides examples of both approvable and potentially unapprovable experiments that a 'human subjects review committee' might consider.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Loftus Witness
Mentioned in the header as the subject of the direct examination ("Loftus - direct") and is the person answering the ...

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
human subjects review committee committee
Mentioned as the body that reviews and approves proposals for studies with human participants.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
A witness identified as Loftus provides testimony regarding the ethical review process for psychological studies involving human subjects, specifically focusing on the implantation of false memories.
Court or deposition setting
Loftus Unnamed Questioner

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned as the location where the process of review for studies occurs.

Relationships (1)

Unnamed Questioner professional Loftus
The document is a transcript of a formal legal proceeding (direct examination) where one person is questioning the other, who is providing testimony as a witness.

Key Quotes (2)

"So I might want to plant a false memory that something horrible happened that would have been traumatic if it actually had happened, like you were, you know, attacked by a vicious animal. And the human subjects review committee, well, has been known to approve that kind of proposal."
Source
— Loftus (Explaining an example of a false memory experiment that a human subjects review committee has been known to approve.)
DOJ-OGR-00013975.jpg
Quote #1
"But other kinds of studies that might be a little bit more sensitive, the human subjects committee might feel a little uncomfortable about approving, like a deliberate attempt to -- to plant a memory, for example, that your father, you know, forced you to sacrifice animals or breed babies and kill"
Source
— Loftus (Providing a hypothetical example of a more sensitive study involving false memories that a committee might be uncomfortable approving.)
DOJ-OGR-00013975.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document