DOJ-OGR-00020998.jpg

662 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
6
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 662 KB
Summary

This legal document is a court filing that analyzes whether two criminal counts (Count Three and Count Five) are multiplicitous, meaning they charge the same crime. The court concludes that because the Government presented the case as a single, broad conspiracy involving the Defendant and Epstein, the counts are indeed multiplicitous. To avoid double jeopardy, the court rules that it will only impose judgment on one of the counts (Count Three).

People (2)

Name Role Context
Epstein
Mentioned as having a "tight partnership" with the Defendant in a "single decade-long conspiracy... to sexually abuse...
Defendant Defendant
The subject of the legal proceeding, accused of running a common "playbook" and being in a conspiracy with Epstein.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Government Government agency
The prosecuting party in the case, which presented a theory of a singular conspiracy to the jury.
United States Government
Mentioned in the case citation "Ball v. United States, 470 U.S. 856, 865 (1985)".
Court Judicial body
The judicial body making the ruling on the multiplicitous counts, referred to as "the Court".

Timeline (1 events)

The Government presented its case to the jury, arguing a theory of a singular, decade-long conspiracy by the Defendant and Epstein to sexually abuse underage girls.

Relationships (1)

Defendant Co-conspirators Epstein
The document describes a "tight partnership between the Defendant and Epstein" and a "single decade-long conspiracy by the Defendant and Epstein to sexually abuse underage girls."

Key Quotes (6)

"several additional factors . . . not directly addressed in Korfant . . . further point toward a finding of double jeopardy,"
Source
— Unspecified Court (from a prior ruling) (A statement from a previous case explaining factors that support a finding of double jeopardy.)
DOJ-OGR-00020998.jpg
Quote #1
"the fact that the Government, in its opening and closing arguments, presented both cases to the jury as broad conspiracies of an essentially identical nature."
Source
— Unspecified Court (from 356 F.3d at 197) (A specific factor cited from a previous case that points toward double jeopardy, which the current court finds applicable.)
DOJ-OGR-00020998.jpg
Quote #2
"playbook"
Source
— Government (attributed) (Describing the common method the Defendant allegedly used in a conspiracy.)
DOJ-OGR-00020998.jpg
Quote #3
"over and over and over again,"
Source
— Government (attributed) (Describing the repetitive nature of the Defendant's alleged actions.)
DOJ-OGR-00020998.jpg
Quote #4
"scheme"
Source
— Government (attributed) (A term used by the Government to refer to the singular conspiracy to abuse all victim witnesses.)
DOJ-OGR-00020998.jpg
Quote #5
"If the jury convicts on more than one multiplicitous count, the defendant’s right not to suffer multiple punishments for the same offense will be protected by having the court enter judgment on only one of the multiplicitous counts."
Source
— Court (citing Josephberg, 459 F.3d at 355) (Explaining the legal remedy for a conviction on multiplicitous counts.)
DOJ-OGR-00020998.jpg
Quote #6

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document