HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022314.jpg
4.1 MB
Extraction Summary
0
People
7
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
6
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Federal register publication page
File Size:
4.1 MB
Summary
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) justification for a new rule requiring employers to post notices of employee rights. The NLRB concludes the rule will not have a significant economic impact on small businesses, estimating the cost at $64.40, and refutes critical comments from organizations like Baker & Daniels LLP. Despite the user's prompt suggesting a link to Epstein, the document's content is exclusively about U.S. labor law and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
Organizations (7)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Board / National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) |
The regulatory agency proposing and analyzing the rule impacting small businesses.
|
|
| U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) |
Referenced for its definitions and guidance on the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA).
|
|
| Siemons Mailing Service |
Cited in a 1959 NLRB case that established a jurisdictional financial threshold.
|
|
| Baker & Daniels LLP |
A law firm that submitted a comment arguing the NLRB understated the economic impact of the proposed rule.
|
|
| Cass County Electric Cooperative |
An organization that submitted a comment criticizing the NLRB's cost analysis methodology.
|
|
| Congress |
Mentioned as having given the NLRB broad jurisdiction.
|
|
| House Oversight |
Appears in the document's footer ('HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022314'), likely indicating the committee that collected or catalo...
|
Timeline (2 events)
1959
NLRB case 'Siemons Mailing Service, 122 NLRB 81' which established a financial jurisdictional standard.
The Board (NLRB)
Siemons Mailing Service
2011-08-30
Publication of 'Rules and Regulations' in the Federal Register, Vol. 76, No. 168.
Federal Register
The Board (NLRB)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
|
The document pertains to federal regulations within the United States.
|
Relationships (3)
The Board (NLRB)
→
Regulator-Regulated
→
Small Businesses
The document details the Board's imposition of a new notice-posting rule and its analysis of the economic impact on small businesses.
Baker & Daniels LLP submitted a formal comment opposing the Board's analysis and conclusion regarding the economic impact of its rule.
Cass County Electric Cooperative
→
Adversarial/Critical
→
The Board (NLRB)
Cass County Electric Cooperative submitted a formal comment criticizing the Board's methodology in its cost analysis.
Key Quotes (6)
"what is ‘significant’ * * * will vary depending on the problem that needs to be addressed, the rule’s requirements, and the preliminary assessment of the rule’s impact."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022314.jpg
Quote #1
"actual economic impact of the rule’s effect and purpose."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022314.jpg
Quote #2
"economic realities of unionization,"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022314.jpg
Quote #3
"the Board’s RFA certification is invalid, and [that] the Board must prepare an initial regulatory flexibility analysis."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022314.jpg
Quote #4
"the NLRB quickly digresses into an attempt to estimate the cost of the proposed rule on only small businesses."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022314.jpg
Quote #5
"Given the very small estimated cost of compliance, it is possible that the burden on a small business of determining whether it fell into a particular tier might exceed the burden of compliance."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022314.jpg
Quote #6
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document