DOJ-OGR-00016935.jpg
628 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
628 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding filed on August 10, 2022. An attorney argues that a specific conspiracy charge is narrowly focused on a violation of New York law, with Jane as the sole victim. The attorney distinguishes this from separate conduct in Florida involving a person named Carolyn and clarifies that while witnesses Kate and Annie provided testimony, they are not victims under this particular charge.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn |
Mentioned in relation to conduct in Florida, which is argued to be separate from the New York law violation.
|
|
| Jane | Alleged Victim |
Identified as the sole alleged victim of a conspiracy involving a violation of New York law. Her statement is cited a...
|
| Kate | Witness |
Her testimony can be considered by the jury as evidence of a conspiracy, but she is not considered a victim of the sp...
|
| Annie | Witness |
Her testimony can be considered by the jury as evidence of a conspiracy, but she is not considered a victim of the sp...
|
| your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by the speaker, indicating the presence of a judge presiding over the proceedings.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court | government agency |
Mentioned as having instructed the jury.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the document as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
An attorney makes a legal argument to a judge, clarifying that a specific conspiracy charge is based solely on a violation of New York law related to a single victim, Jane, and distinguishing this from conduct in Florida involving Carolyn and the testimony of witnesses Kate and Annie.
Courtroom
Unnamed Speaker (Attorney)
your Honor (Judge)
Key Quotes (3)
"the only evidence we have that goes to -- that actually establishes a violation of New York law, which is the object of this conspiracy, and the object of the transportation conspiracy, is what Jane said."Source
— Unnamed Speaker (Attorney)
(Arguing that Jane's statement is the sole evidence for the violation of New York law central to the conspiracy charge.)
DOJ-OGR-00016935.jpg
Quote #1
"for them to actually convict on this, they have to believe that somebody committed a violation of New York law, and that relates solely to Jane..."Source
— Unnamed Speaker (Attorney)
(Explaining the legal standard for the jury to convict, emphasizing the charge's exclusive connection to Jane.)
DOJ-OGR-00016935.jpg
Quote #2
"they are not victims of this conspiracy, there was no violation of New York law that they testified to, and that is Jane alone."Source
— Unnamed Speaker (Attorney)
(Distinguishing witnesses Annie and Kate from the victim, Jane, in the context of the specific New York-based conspiracy charge.)
DOJ-OGR-00016935.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document