DOJ-OGR-00021137.jpg
587 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
587 KB
Summary
This legal document, dated February 28, 2023, is a page from a court filing discussing a legal argument related to a criminal case. It outlines the requirements for a "constructive amendment claim," citing the precedent set in *United States v. D'Amelio*. The context is an appeal or motion by a defendant named Maxwell, who was charged under Count Four with transporting a person named Jane across state lines for sexual activity in violation of New York Penal Law.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant in Count Four, accused of knowingly transporting Jane in interstate commerce for sexual ac...
|
| Jane | Victim/Witness |
Mentioned as the person allegedly transported by Maxwell for the purpose of sexual activity.
|
| D'Amelio | Defendant in a cited case |
Mentioned in the case citation "United States v. D'Amelio" which sets a precedent for constructive amendment claims.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit | government agency |
Cited as "2d Cir. 2012" in the case citation for United States v. D'Amelio.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the context of "New York law" and "New York Penal Law, Section 130.55".
|
Key Quotes (4)
"that Maxwell knowingly transported Jane in interstate commerce with the intent that Jane engage in sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense in violation of New York law,"Source
— Jury Charge
(Describing the second element of Count Four in the Jury Charge.)
DOJ-OGR-00021137.jpg
Quote #1
"New York Penal Law, Section 130.55, sexual abuse in the third degree."Source
— Jury Charge
(Specifying the criminal offense under New York law related to Count Four.)
DOJ-OGR-00021137.jpg
Quote #2
"the terms of the indictment are, in effect, altered by the presentation of evidence and jury instructions which so modify essential elements of the offense charged that there is a substantial likelihood that the defendant may have been convicted of an offense other than that charged in the indictment."Source
— United States v. D'Amelio
(Defining the standard a defendant must demonstrate to prevail on a constructive amendment claim.)
DOJ-OGR-00021137.jpg
Quote #3
"given notice of the core of criminality to be proven at trial."Source
— United States v. D'Amelio
(Stating a requirement for the defendant in a trial.)
DOJ-OGR-00021137.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document