UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
CABRANES
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
WESLEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
LOHIER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-27 | Court ruling | The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's orders and denied Ghislaine Maxwell's motion f... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-04-27 | Court ruling | The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's orders and denied Ghislaine Maxwell's motion f... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Legal notice | Issuance of a 'NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING' regarding the submitted 'Notice of Appearance as Addit... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Legal notice | The Court issued a Notice of Defective Filing for the motion for bail. | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Legal notice issuance | Issuance of a 'NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING' by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second C... | Thurgood Marshall U.S. Cour... | View |
| 2020-10-19 | Court ruling | The appeal by Defendant-Appellant Maxwell was dismissed, and the motion to consolidate was denied... | N/A | View |
| 2020-10-19 | Court ruling | The court dismissed the appeal of Defendant-Appellant Maxwell and denied the motion to consolidat... | N/A | View |
| 2020-09-28 | Court order | The court granted the appellant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) motion to file three documents under seal: ... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2019-08-05 | Legal notice | The Court issued a Notice of Defective Filing because the submitted document was not text-searcha... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
21-770_Documents%20Pt%202%20of%203.pdf
This document is a compilation of legal filings from late 2020 to early 2021 concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's repeated attempts to secure release on bail pending her trial for sex trafficking conspiracy. It includes the Government's opposition detailing her flight risk, wealth, and foreign ties (specifically to France and the UK), a victim statement from Annie Farmer, correspondence from the French Ministry of Justice confirming they do not extradite nationals, and Judge Nathan's orders denying bail. The documents highlight Maxwell's offer to renounce her foreign citizenships and pledge significant assets, all of which the Court found insufficient to assure her appearance.
22-1426_Documents.pdf
This document consists of a Docketing Notice from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals dated July 8, 2022, for the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), and a Notice of Appeal and Criminal Docket from the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed July 7, 2022. It details Maxwell's conviction and sentencing, including multi-year imprisonment terms and a $750,000 fine for charges related to conspiracy to entice minors for illegal sex acts, transport minors for sexual activity, and sex trafficking, with some counts dismissed or deemed multiplicitous.
20-3061_Documents.pdf
This document is the complete appellate record for case 20-3061, an interlocutory appeal by Ghislaine Maxwell against the United States. Maxwell appealed a District Court order denying her motion to modify a protective order, seeking permission to share confidential criminal discovery materials under seal with the judge in a related civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell) to challenge the government's acquisition of evidence. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, ruling that the protective order decision was not a final judgment or an appealable collateral order, and denied Maxwell's motion to consolidate the criminal appeal with the civil appeal.
19-2221_Documents.pdf
This document contains a docketing notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding Jeffrey Epstein's appeal (19-2221) from a District Court decision (1:19-cr-490-1), dated July 23, 2019. It also includes the Notice of Appeal filed on July 22, 2019, detailing Epstein's legal representation and the pending charges of sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking of children. The document lists multiple attorneys representing Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office representing the USA.
043-01.pdf
This document is a packet of blank legal forms and instructions provided by the Southern District of New York for filing an appeal. It includes a letter from Clerk Ruby J. Krajick explaining the appeal process and fees ($605), a blank Notice of Appeal form, a Motion for Extension of Time, a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, and a financial affidavit for waiving fees. The document is filed under Case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR but contains no specific case details or filled-in information.
20250728111721067_24-1073ReplyInSupportOfPetitionForWritO...
This document is a legal reply brief filed in the Supreme Court on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell (Petitioner) against the United States, dated July 28, 2025. The brief argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed by Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida, which promised not to prosecute 'potential co-conspirators' in 'the United States,' should legally bind other districts like the Southern District of New York. The filing highlights a circuit split on whether US Attorneys can bind other districts and contends that the Second Circuit's decision allowing Maxwell's prosecution violates contract law and the plain text of the agreement.
20250714161434468_24-1073_Maxwell_Opp.pdf
This document is a legal brief filed by the United States Solicitor General in July 2025 opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court. The government argues that the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed by Jeffrey Epstein in Florida does not bar the Southern District of New York from prosecuting Maxwell, as the agreement was contractually limited to the Florida district and Maxwell was not a party to it. The brief details the history of the Epstein investigation, the terms of the NPA, and relevant legal precedents regarding the scope of plea agreements binding different US Attorney's Offices.
20250410114623513_No.%2024-_Markus%20Moss%20PLLC%20COC.pdf
This document is a Certificate of Compliance for a Petition for Writ of Certiorari submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell (Petitioner) against the United States of America. The document certifies the word count of the petition (4,956 words) and is notarized by Aza Salinder Donner in the District of Columbia on April 10, 2025.
20250117162420418_AMENDED%20Application%20to%20Extend%20T...
This document is an amended application to the US Supreme Court requesting a 45-day extension for Ghislaine Maxwell to file a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. Her new attorney, David Oscar Markus, cites his recent retention and conflicting trial schedules as reasons for the delay. The application highlights a legal question regarding a circuit split on whether plea agreements are binding on federal prosecutors across different districts.
20250117133905126_22-1426.pdf
This document is a formal legal opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirming the conviction and 240-month prison sentence of Ghislaine Maxwell for sex trafficking and related offenses. The court rejected Maxwell's appeal on five grounds, including arguments regarding a non-prosecution agreement, statute of limitations, juror misconduct, jury instructions, and sentencing reasonableness. The document also includes a subsequent order from November 2024 denying Maxwell's petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc.
2023.10.03%20Response.pdf
In this May 2023 filing to the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, a pro se incarcerated Ghislaine Maxwell requests a 180-day stay in her civil suit for indemnification against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Maxwell argues she needs time to find new counsel following her previous attorney's withdrawal, citing severe communication restrictions and lack of access to legal resources (computers, state case law) within FCI Tallahassee. She also argues the civil case should be paused pending the outcome of her criminal appeal (2nd Circuit Case 22-14626-CR) and cites a 2002 lawsuit (Shanks v. Wexner) as evidence that Epstein historically indemnified her for legal costs.
EFTA00032387.pdf
An email from Michael C. Miller of Steptoe & Johnson LLP dated August 20, 2019 (10 days after Epstein's death), regarding the case 'United States of America v. Epstein'. Miller asks the recipient (whose name is redacted) to sign and return a stipulation to withdraw an appeal in the 2nd Circuit Court so that it can be filed. The email includes Reid Weingarten and Morgan Lucas in the CC field.
EFTA00029717.pdf
An email thread from August 20, 2019 (ten days after Jeffrey Epstein's death) between attorney Michael Miller of Steptoe & Johnson LLP and a redacted individual. The correspondence concerns the signing and filing of a 'Stipulation to Withdraw Appeal' in the case United States of America v. Epstein U.S. in the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals (Docket No. 19-2221), likely closing legal proceedings following the defendant's death.
EFTA00028060.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated September 11, 2020. It orders the United States to submit an amicus brief regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to consolidate her appeal with the criminal case United States v. Maxwell (No. 20-3061) and adjourns a hearing previously scheduled for September 22, 2020.
EFTA00028047.pdf
This document is a blank 'Oral Argument Statement' form for the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Local Rule 34.1(a)). While the specific case details, names, and dates are not filled in, the option 'I want oral argument only if at least one other party does' is checked. The document bears the Bates stamp EFTA00028047.
EFTA00023011.pdf
This document is a formal order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021. It affirms previous District Court orders from December 2020 and March 2021 that denied Ghislaine Maxwell's requests for bail pending trial. The court also addresses a complaint made during oral arguments regarding Maxwell's sleep deprivation while incarcerated, directing her counsel to address those specific concerns to the District Court.
EFTA00020990.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (cmecf@ca2.uscourts.gov) dated September 24, 2020. It confirms the filing of an 'Appendix' in the case 20-3061, United States of America v. Maxwell. The recipient information is largely redacted.
EFTA00019667.pdf
A legal stipulation filed on August 20, 2019, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 19-2221-cr). Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein and the United States agreed to dismiss the appeal with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42, with no costs or fees recoverable by either party. This document effectively ends the specific appellate case mentioned, likely following Epstein's death earlier that month (though death is not explicitly cited in the text).
EFTA00014506.pdf
A formal notice from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated July 18, 2017, announcing a change in the assigned case manager for docket 16-3945cv ([Redacted] v. Maxwell). The document lists Robert A. Katzmann as Chief Judge and references the underlying District Court case (15-cv-7433) presided over by Judge Sweet.
DOJ-OGR-00000155.tif
This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated November 25, 2024, denying Ghislaine Maxwell's (AKA SEALED DEFENDANT 1) petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc. The order was issued by Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of the Court, following a session held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00000139.tif
This document outlines a legal analysis regarding perjury charges against Maxwell, stemming from her deposition in a civil case. The Court found the perjury charges legally tenable, asserting that Maxwell's defenses should be left to the jury, and that the questions posed were not overly ambiguous to preclude a perjury charge.
DOJ-OGR-00000043.tif
This document is a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by Ghislaine Maxwell, seeking review of a judgment from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. It details the procedural history of her case, including the Second Circuit's opinion issued on September 17, 2024, and the denial of her motion for en banc review on November 25, 2024. The core of her appeal rests on the argument that the United States prosecuted her as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein, despite a prior non-prosecution agreement that allegedly covered Epstein's co-conspirators.
DOJ-OGR-00000034.tif
This document is a Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed with the Supreme Court of the United States by Ghislaine Maxwell, also identified as SEALED DEFENDANT 1, against the United States of America. Dated April 10, 2025, it seeks review of a decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, with David Oscar Markus of MARKUS/Moss PLLC serving as counsel for Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00000033.tif
This document is a Certificate of Compliance for a Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed in the Supreme Court of the United States by Ghislaine Maxwell (AKA Sealed Defendant 1) against the United States of America. It certifies that the document contains 4,956 words, as required by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(h), and was sworn to and subscribed by Notary Public Aza Salinder Donner on April 10, 2025.
DOJ-OGR-00015056.jpg
This legal document is a court order denying defendant Maxwell's request for full access to the grand jury transcripts from her case. The court finds she has not demonstrated a particularized need for the materials, as required by law. However, the court has ordered the government to produce the transcripts for a private (in camera) review by July 28, 2025, after which the court may provide excerpts to Maxwell's counsel if deemed necessary.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity