DOJ-OGR-00010180.jpg
461 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
461 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript where an attorney, Ms. Davis, argues against a motion for a new trial. She references a letter from Catherine Conrad about jury deliberations concerning David Parse, noting the jury struggled with the legal definitions of 'wilfully' and 'knowingly' but ultimately made a deliberate and informed decision, as evidenced by their verdict on conspiracy and tax evasion counts. The discussion highlights the legal nuances that influenced the jury's split verdict.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Parse |
Mentioned in the context of a split verdict, which is argued as evidence of a lack of prejudice.
|
|
| your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by a speaker, presumably an attorney, in court.
|
| Catherine Conrad |
Wrote a letter to the government about discussions and deliberations regarding David Parse.
|
|
| David Parse |
The subject of discussions and deliberations mentioned in Catherine Conrad's letter.
|
|
| Mr. Shechtman |
An attorney who apparently omitted information from his brief regarding the jury's struggle with legal definitions.
|
|
| MR. SNECHTMAN | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, likely the same person as Mr. Shechtman, who apologizes to the Court.
|
| MS. DAVIS | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, arguing that the jury made a deliberate and informed decision.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the transcript, presiding over the proceedings.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| government | government agency |
Recipient of a letter from Catherine Conrad.
|
| Court | government agency |
The judicial body being addressed and which was asked to reread definitions to the jury.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (3 events)
An attorney, Ms. Davis, is addressing the court regarding a prior verdict and a motion for a new trial.
Court
A jury had discussions and deliberations regarding David Parse, and struggled with the definitions of 'wilfully' and 'knowingly' for different counts, including conspiracy and tax evasion.
Catherine Conrad
David Parse (as subject)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
Relationships (2)
Both are speakers in a court transcript, addressing the court and each other, indicating they are likely opposing counsel in a legal case.
Catherine Conrad wrote a letter about discussions and deliberations she was involved in regarding David Parse, suggesting they were both involved in the same legal proceeding, possibly as jurors or co-defendants.
Key Quotes (2)
"Well, I'll wait. I apologize to the Court."Source
— MR. SNECHTMAN
(Said after being interrupted or corrected by Ms. Davis during her address to the court.)
DOJ-OGR-00010180.jpg
Quote #1
"Thank you, Ms. Davis."Source
— THE COURT
(Said at the conclusion of Ms. Davis's argument.)
DOJ-OGR-00010180.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document