DOJ-OGR-00009921.jpg
1020 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
1020 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. It details the direct examination of an unnamed witness by an attorney named Conrad regarding the witness's prior statements in court, where they called a defense motion 'ridiculous' and made comments to Judge Pauley about his background. The witness is largely uncooperative, frequently claiming a lack of recall, leading to a tense exchange about their motives and credibility.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| PAUL M. DAUGERDAS | Named party in case |
Mentioned in the case title 'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,'
|
| Conrad | Attorney |
The individual conducting the direct examination (asking the 'Q' questions). Also addressed as 'Ms. Conrad' on page 116.
|
| MR. OKULA | Attorney |
Makes objections on behalf of the witness during the testimony.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
The presiding judge who rules on objections ('Overruled.', 'Sustained as to form.').
|
| Judge Pauley | Judge |
A judge whose attendance at Duke University and role in a prior hearing are subjects of the questioning. He is also i...
|
| Clinton | President of the United States |
Mentioned in the context of Judge Pauley being a 'Clinton appointee'.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | government agency |
The plaintiff in the case 'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,'
|
| Duke University | university |
Mentioned as the university Judge Pauley attended 30 years or more ago.
|
| Pacer | public record system |
Mentioned by the witness as a public record system for court filings.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings, listed at the bottom of the page.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2011-03-01
A motion alleged that the witness 'came into court and lied and lied and lied on March 1, 2011.'
Courtroom
Unnamed Witness
2011-12-20
A hearing where the witness made statements to Judge Pauley that are the subject of the current examination.
Courtroom
Unnamed Witness
Judge Pauley
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS' at the bottom of the document.
|
Relationships (3)
Conrad is an attorney conducting a direct examination of the witness in a court proceeding, questioning their credibility and prior statements in an adversarial manner.
Mr. Okula acts as counsel for the witness, making objections to protect the witness from Conrad's line of questioning.
The witness made statements directly to Judge Pauley in a prior court proceeding on December 20th, and later Googled his background.
Key Quotes (4)
"I don't know what "irrational" means. I'm not a psychologist."Source
— Unnamed Witness (A)
(In response to being asked if their previous statement was irrational.)
DOJ-OGR-00009921.jpg
Quote #1
"Come on, this is anything in favor of the defendants and they brought the motion against the prosecution. It's ridiculous."Source
— Unnamed Witness (A)
(The witness is being questioned about this prior statement they made.)
DOJ-OGR-00009921.jpg
Quote #2
"If you want another Clinton appointment, it's not going to happen"Source
— Unnamed Witness (A)
(A statement the witness allegedly made to Judge Pauley, which the witness claims not to recall.)
DOJ-OGR-00009921.jpg
Quote #3
"So you were being a smart ass to a federal judge, is that what you call it?"Source
— Conrad (Q)
(Questioning the witness's motivation for saying they were 'just being smart' in their comments to the judge.)
DOJ-OGR-00009921.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document