Duke University
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00015246.tif
This document is a list of academic institutions, legal associations, and other organizations, along with events, grouped by year from 1974 to 1980. It appears to be a chronological record of affiliations, seminars, and conferences, potentially related to a professional's career or an institution's activities. The document also includes page numbering and a document identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00015246'.
DOJ-OGR-00009242.jpg
This document is a court transcript from 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas' (dated Feb 15, 2012) filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It features the cross-examination of a witness named Conrad (likely the infamous Juror 50 from the Daugerdas trial) regarding her bias, her admission to 'Googling' the judge and attorneys, and her 'smart a-s-s' comments about Judge Pauley being a 'Clinton appointee.' This transcript was likely used in the Maxwell case to argue legal precedent regarding juror misconduct.
DOJ-OGR-00009241.jpg
This document is a condensed court transcript from the case 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas', filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). It features the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad, regarding her alcohol consumption (specifically 'cheap vodka') and her behavior during a previous court appearance before Judge Pauley on December 20th. The testimony highlights erratic statements Conrad previously made to Judge Pauley, including comments about his intelligence, his attendance at Duke University, and his potential desire for a 'Clinton appointment'.
DOJ-OGR-00009921.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. It details the direct examination of an unnamed witness by an attorney named Conrad regarding the witness's prior statements in court, where they called a defense motion 'ridiculous' and made comments to Judge Pauley about his background. The witness is largely uncooperative, frequently claiming a lack of recall, leading to a tense exchange about their motives and credibility.
DOJ-OGR-00009920.jpg
This document is a condensed transcript (pages 109-112) from the case United States v. Daugerdas (2012), ostensibly filed as Exhibit A-5637 in the later Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The transcript features the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Conrad, focusing on her alcohol consumption (specifically 'cheap vodka') and a previous erratic court appearance on December 20th before Judge Pauley. The questioning highlights her bizarre statements to Judge Pauley regarding Duke University football and 'Clinton appointments,' seemingly to attack her credibility or mental state.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019704.jpg
This document is page 216 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the filename and content). It details the privatization of U.S. government background checks initiated by the Clinton administration in 1996. The text criticizes the private firm USIS (owned by Providence Equity Partners) for failing to access CIA records during Edward Snowden's 2011 background check and for fraudulently 'flushing' over 665,000 incomplete investigations to maximize profit, leading to a 2014 lawsuit.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020506.jpg
This page from a House Oversight Committee report (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020506) details the political pressure exerted by the Chinese government on US university administrations regarding academic collaborations. It highlights how the CCP uses exchange programs as leverage, punishing universities like Emory, Maryland, and UCSD for hosting the Dalai Lama or discussing sensitive topics. The document notes a deterioration in academic freedom in China since 2013, citing specific policy shifts and the termination of numerous partnerships in 2018.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020503.jpg
This document page, seemingly from a House Oversight report, details foreign influence operations by the Chinese government within Western universities. It describes specific incidents of retaliation against UCSD, the monitoring of students via CSSAs, and harassment of students at the University of Maryland and Duke University for expressions of free speech or political dissent. It also notes a trend in Australia of students recording professors for political reporting.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017072.jpg
This document is a page from the attendee list for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011. It lists high-profile individuals from global business, politics, and academia, including corporate CEOs (Google, Credit Suisse, Wal-Mart), government officials (Mayor of Mexico City, Russian Federation aides), and royalty. Notably, the list includes 'H.R.H. Duke of York' (Prince Andrew), a known associate of Jeffrey Epstein, listed in his capacity as UK Special Representative for International Trade and Investment. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017072.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017070.jpg
This document is a page from the participant directory of the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011, bearing the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017070. It lists high-profile attendees including business executives (Michael Dell, Aliko Dangote), academic leaders (John J. DeGioia), government officials, and celebrities (Robert De Niro), detailing their roles, organizations, and countries of origin. The document is likely part of a larger production of documents provided to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017555.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a biographical booklet or conference program (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017555), detailing the professional achievements of physicist Lisa Randall and botanist Peter Raven. It lists their academic affiliations (Harvard, Missouri Botanical Garden), awards, publications, and contributions to their respective fields. The text does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein, though the document origination (House Oversight) suggests it is part of a larger collection of subpoenaed records likely related to scientific gatherings or foundations associated with him.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017534.jpg
This document is a biographical profile of political commentator David Brooks, likely from a dossier or 'Edge' profile series found in House Oversight documents. It details his educational background, career trajectory through major publications (WSJ, NYT, Weekly Standard), and outlines his evolving political stances on the Iraq War, the Republican party, Barack Obama, and social issues like gay marriage. The document includes specific dates of his writings and interactions with figures like Milton Friedman and Barack Obama.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014966.jpg
This document is a printout of page 16 from the TED2017 conference program website, dated April 20, 2017. It contains biographical information for five speakers: physicist David Brenner, photographer Levon Biss, neuroscientist Mehdi Ordikhani-Seyedlar, inventor Richard Browning, and Nobel laureate Elizabeth Blackburn. The document bears the stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014966', indicating it was collected as evidence by the House Oversight Committee, likely in relation to an investigation involving Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the scientific community or his attendance at TED conferences.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014960.jpg
This document is page 10 of 21 from a printout of the TED2017 conference program, specifically detailing 'Session 5: Mind, Meaning' scheduled for April 26, 2017. It lists biographies for speakers Michael Patrick Lynch, Dan Ariely, Mariano Sigman, Anika Paulson, and Lisa Genova, along with the session host, Helen Walters. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014960, indicating its inclusion in a House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's connections to scientific communities or conferences.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030284.jpg
This document is a single page (page 17) stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030284'. The text appears to be an excerpt from a non-fiction book or article discussing the evolutionary psychology and health benefits of optimism. It references studies by Duke University regarding economics and other studies concerning heart disease and cancer recovery. While part of a production likely related to an investigation, the text itself contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or specific criminal activities.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity