DOJ-OGR-00009592.jpg
723 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
723 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 621) dated February 25, 2022. The author argues against a defendant's claim of multiplicity, urging the Court to apply the 'Korfant factors' for analyzing counts within the same indictment. The filing cites several legal precedents to support its position that the defendant's claim should be rejected because the counts are legally distinct.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Korfant |
Mentioned in the context of the 'Korfant factor' and 'Korfant factors', a legal test.
|
|
| Guzman |
Party in the cited case 'Guzman, 7 F. App’x at 54-55'.
|
|
| Diallo |
Party in the cited case 'United States v. Diallo, 507 F. App’x 89, 91'.
|
|
| Estrada |
Party in the cited case 'Estrada, 320 F.3d at 180-81'.
|
|
| Sattar |
Party in the cited case 'Sattar, 314 F. Supp. 2d at 307'.
|
|
| Hicks |
Party in the cited case 'United States v. Hicks, 5 F.4th 270, 275'.
|
|
| Blockburger |
Party in the cited case 'Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932)'.
|
|
| Cooper |
Party in the cited case 'United States v. Cooper, 886 F.3d 146'.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court | government agency |
The judicial body being addressed in the legal argument.
|
| United States | government agency |
Named as a party in several cited legal cases, such as 'United States v. Diallo'.
|
| DOJ-OGR | government agency |
Appears as part of the document identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00009592' in the footer.
|
Relationships (1)
The document details a legal argument made by an unnamed party (implied prosecution) to the Court, urging it to reject a motion or claim made by the defendant.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document