DOJ-OGR-00008441.jpg
691 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
691 KB
Summary
This legal document, part of a court filing, outlines a joint proposal from the prosecution and defense regarding the presentation of closing arguments. The parties argue that alternatives like toggling monitors or using printed binders for the jury are unworkable due to potential interruptions, logistical difficulties, and the risk of inadvertently exposing sealed material, which would violate the privacy of victims and third parties. They propose instead to provide redacted copies of their presentation slides to the public on the following day.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| jurors | Jury member |
Mentioned in the context of viewing presentations during closing arguments, either on monitors or in printed binders.
|
| court staff | Court employee |
Mentioned as being responsible for turning monitors on and off, and as a potential source of human error that could l...
|
| victims | Victim |
Their privacy interests are cited as a reason to avoid displaying sealed material publicly.
|
| third parties | Third party |
Their privacy interests are cited as a reason to avoid displaying sealed material publicly.
|
| counsel | Legal counsel |
Mentioned in the context of finding it difficult to ensure jurors are following along with printed materials during c...
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judicial body |
Mentioned as having likely observed jurors' behavior with paper materials during the trial.
|
| The Government | Government agency |
One of the parties in the case, presenting a closing argument to which the defense may wish to respond.
|
| The Defense | Legal team |
One of the parties in the case, who wishes to retain the ability to adjust their slides in response to the Government...
|
| DOJ | Government agency |
Inferred from the Bates number 'DOJ-OGR-00008441' in the document footer, indicating the Department of Justice.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in relation to courthouse staff, whose error could result in the publication of sealed material.
|
Relationships (2)
The document describes them as opposing sides in a legal case, with the defense wanting to respond to the Government's closing argument.
The parties are jointly making a proposal to the Court regarding the logistics of the closing arguments, indicating a cooperative effort to resolve a procedural issue.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document