third parties
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
defendant
|
Financial |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Discovery process in the Giuffre v. Maxwell case, which included large document productions, resp... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00008446.jpg
This legal document, filed by the Government on December 19, 2021, outlines the status of various trial exhibits. The Government reports that after conferring with the defense, they have reached an agreement on redactions for certain exhibits (GX 603, GX 604, DX AF-1) and asks the Court to admit specific versions into evidence, some publicly and one under seal to protect third-party privacy.
DOJ-OGR-00008441.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, outlines a joint proposal from the prosecution and defense regarding the presentation of closing arguments. The parties argue that alternatives like toggling monitors or using printed binders for the jury are unworkable due to potential interruptions, logistical difficulties, and the risk of inadvertently exposing sealed material, which would violate the privacy of victims and third parties. They propose instead to provide redacted copies of their presentation slides to the public on the following day.
DOJ-OGR-00002250.jpg
This document is page 18 of a court order filed on December 30, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text details the Court's rejection of bail arguments, stating that the Defendant's significant wealth and assets (including $4 million in a hedge fund) would allow her to flee and compensate any bond supporters for their losses. It further outlines strict proposed release conditions, including home confinement, GPS monitoring, and security guards, which the Court ultimately finds insufficient to mitigate flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00002205(1).jpg
This is page 2 of a court order filed on December 23, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Judge Alison J. Nathan orders the defendant to docket redacted documents related to a renewed motion for bail by the same day, citing case law that supports redactions to protect third-party privacy interests.
DOJ-OGR-00002161.jpg
This is the second page of a court order (Document 99) filed on December 18, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Judge Alison J. Nathan orders the Government to docket redacted documents and exhibits by that same day, ruling that the redactions are narrowly tailored to protect third-party privacy interests. The document cites legal precedents regarding the presumption of access to judicial documents.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity