DOJ-OGR-00002964.jpg
773 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
4
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
773 KB
Summary
This legal document is an argument by the prosecution against a defendant's motion to dismiss an indictment. The prosecution contends that a 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida is irrelevant to the current case. The key reasons are that the defendant was not a party to the NPA, the agreement is not binding on the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (where the case is being tried), and the NPA does not provide immunity for the specific crimes with which the defendant is charged.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein |
Party to a 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida....
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida | government agency |
Referred to as "USAO-SDFL," it is the entity that entered into a 2007 non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein.
|
| U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York | government agency |
Referred to as "USAO-SDNY," it is the prosecuting office in the current case against the defendant and is argued to n...
|
| The Government | government agency |
Refers to the prosecution in the case. The footnote mentions the Government's ongoing investigation into Jeffrey Epst...
|
| The Court | government agency |
The judicial body that the document argues should reject the defendant's arguments.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2007
A non-prosecution agreement ("NPA") was made between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida.
Southern District of Florida
2020-08-21
The Government indicated that the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s co-conspirators remains ongoing.
The defendant seeks to dismiss the Indictment against her based on Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 NPA.
Southern District of New York
The defendant
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The jurisdiction of the U.S. Attorney's Office that made the non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein.
|
|
|
The defendant claims immunity from prosecution for any federal crime 'anywhere, in the United States'.
|
|
|
The jurisdiction where the current case is being prosecuted and where the NPA is argued to be unenforceable.
|
Relationships (2)
They entered into a 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA).
The defendant is attempting to use Jeffrey Epstein's NPA for her own defense. A footnote mentions an ongoing investigation into Epstein's 'co-conspirators' and the possibility of 'additional charges against the defendant' stemming from it.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document