DOJ-OGR-00010390.jpg
716 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
716 KB
Summary
This legal document is a court filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated April 29, 2022. It addresses the Defendant's argument that her conviction was based on a 'constructive amendment' to the indictment, because a jury note suggested they found her guilty of intending a crime in New Mexico, rather than New York as charged. The court refutes this claim, concluding there is no 'substantial likelihood' that the Defendant was convicted of an offense different from the one in the indictment.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein |
Mentioned as a co-conspirator with the Defendant in a scheme to cause underage girls to travel to New York.
|
|
| Jane | Victim |
An individual the Defendant was found to have intended to engage in sexual activity with in New Mexico.
|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Referenced in citations 'Maxwell Br. at 9' and 'Maxwell Reply at 2'. The document discusses her arguments regarding h...
|
| Gramins |
Named in the case citation 'United States v. Gramins, 939 F.3d 429, 444 (2d Cir. 2019)'.
|
|
| D'Amelio |
Named in the case citation 'D’Amelio, 683 F.3d at 416'.
|
|
| Mollica |
Named in the case citation 'United States v. Mollica, 849 F.2d 723, 729 (2d Cir. 1988)'.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States | government agency |
Mentioned as a party in the case citations 'United States v. Gramins' and 'United States v. Mollica'.
|
| Court | government agency |
Referenced throughout the document as the judicial body making decisions and analysis on the case.
|
Timeline (2 events)
The Defendant was convicted on Count Four (transportation of an individual under seventeen with intent to engage in illegal sexual activity) and Count Three (conspiracy to do the same).
Defendant
Jury
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location where Epstein and the Defendant allegedly schemed to bring underage girls for sexual activity, and where...
|
|
|
The location where the Defendant argues the jury found she intended for Jane to engage in sexual activity, which diff...
|
Relationships (1)
The document states that the 'core of criminality' was a 'scheme by Epstein and the Defendant to cause underage girls to travel to New York'.
Key Quotes (2)
"sparingly and in the most extraordinary circumstances, and only in order to avert a perceived miscarriage of justice."Source
— Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(a) / United States v. Gramins
(Describing the standard for granting a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(a).)
DOJ-OGR-00010390.jpg
Quote #1
"convicted of an offense other than that charged in the indictment."Source
— United States v. Mollica, as quoted in D'Amelio
(Quoted to describe the legal standard for a constructive amendment, which the Court concludes did not happen in this case.)
DOJ-OGR-00010390.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document