DOJ-OGR-00020089.jpg
720 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
3
Locations
4
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
720 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on February 18, 2020, argues for the continued detention of a female defendant, asserting she is a significant flight risk due to her financial means, foreign ties, and skill at hiding. The filing dismisses proposed bail conditions, such as private security guards and GPS monitoring, as insufficient to ensure her appearance in court. To support its position, the document cites several past federal cases (Banki, Zarger, Benatar) where courts denied bail under similar circumstances, deeming electronic monitoring and home confinement inadequate for high-risk defendants.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Unnamed Defendant | Defendant |
The subject of the legal argument, referred to as "defendant," "she," and "her." The document argues for her detentio...
|
| Banki | Defendant in a cited case |
Mentioned in the case citation United States v. Banki, where bail was denied to a naturalized citizen native to Iran.
|
| Zarger | Defendant in a cited case |
Mentioned in the case citation United States v. Zarger, where an application for bail was rejected.
|
| Benatar | Defendant in a cited case |
Mentioned in the case citation United States v. Benatar, which is cited for the same reasoning as the Zarger case.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States | Government agency |
Appears as the plaintiff in several cited court cases (United States v. Banki, United States v. Zarger, United States...
|
| unnamed security company | Company |
A company that would potentially lose $1 million if the defendant fled, a risk the defendant is argued to be willing ...
|
Timeline (4 events)
2000-08-04
In United States v. Zarger, the court rejected the defendant's application for bail.
E.D.N.Y.
2002-10-10
In United States v. Benatar, the court made a similar ruling regarding bail conditions.
E.D.N.Y.
2010-01-21
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the native country of the defendant in the cited case of United States v. Banki.
|
|
|
Southern District of New York, the court district for the cited United States v. Banki case.
|
|
|
Eastern District of New York, the court district for the cited United States v. Zarger and United States v. Benatar c...
|
Relationships (1)
The document presents the United States' argument against the defendant's release on bail in a criminal case.
Key Quotes (3)
"privately funded jail"Source
— Unknown (Quoted by the author of the document)
(Used to describe the defendant's proposed release conditions, which the document argues are not warranted.)
DOJ-OGR-00020089.jpg
Quote #1
"hardly foolproof"Source
— Court in United States v. Banki
(A description of electronic monitoring, cited to argue against its effectiveness for the current defendant.)
DOJ-OGR-00020089.jpg
Quote #2
"at best . . . limits a fleeing defendant’s head start"Source
— Court in United States v. Zarger
(A description of home detention with electronic monitoring, cited to argue its insufficiency as a bail condition.)
DOJ-OGR-00020089.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document