unnamed defendant
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
defendant's spouse
|
Friend |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Defendant’s friends and family members
|
Friend |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
A family member
|
Friend |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
unnamed attorneys
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Multiple victims
|
Criminal |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ANALISA TORRES
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Danielle Hopson
|
Supervisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicholas Christ
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Speaker (Judge)
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
BOP
|
Custodial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. government
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
unnamed victims
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
unnamed spouse
|
Marital |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
unnamed judge
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal filing | The defense submitted a financial report showing the defendant has approximately $22 million in a... | Court | View |
| N/A | Interview | The defendant had an interview with Pretrial Services where she failed to mention her trust. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | The defendant's trial, during which other employees of Epstein were cross-examined. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal motion | The Defendant filed a new motion proposing an expansive set of bail conditions to address the Cou... | Court | View |
| N/A | Sexual conduct | Witnesses testified about sexual conduct by the Defendant or Epstein. | Florida, New Mexico, or London | View |
| N/A | Trip | The defendant transported Jane to New York. | New York | View |
| N/A | Sexual assault | The defendant touched Jane and Carolyn’s breasts. | United States | View |
| N/A | Grooming | The Defendant and Epstein used financial gifts and payments to acquire victims' trust and extend ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Shift in strategy | The financial quid pro quo between the Defendant, Epstein, and victims may have become more expli... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Flight | The defendant fled when first approached by FBI agents. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal hearing | An initial bail hearing was held where the defendant's assets were discussed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Evasion | The defendant sought to evade not only the press, but also law enforcement. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Arrest | The defendant was arrested, at which time she made statements to Pretrial Services. | United States | View |
| N/A | Legal case | The speaker argued before Former Chief Judge Mark Wolf on behalf of a defendant arrested for orga... | Boston (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Settlement of Jane Doe 102's claim | N/A | View |
| N/A | Defendant's activities | In a cited S.D.N.Y. case, a defendant with private security guards was outside his apartment virt... | Chinatown | View |
| N/A | Legal motion | The Defendant filed her third motion for bail. | Court | View |
| N/A | Pretrial confinement | The defendant was held in pretrial confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center. | Metropolitan Detention Center | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The original hearing where the defendant's detention was decided. | United States | View |
| 2023-06-29 | Legal ruling | A judge overrules a defendant's objection to a sentencing enhancement for undue influence in a co... | Court (implied) | View |
| 2023-02-28 | Legal proceeding | A judge is delivering a ruling or explanation regarding the application of sentencing guidelines ... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Legal ruling | A judge overrules a defendant's objection regarding a sentencing enhancement, stating that the un... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court hearing | A judge determines a defendant's sentencing guidelines, calculating a total offense level of 37 a... | Southern District (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court hearing | A court proceeding where the judge rules on objections to the calculation of the sentencing guide... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2020-12-10 | Court proceeding | A hearing where the government argued against the defendant's release, citing her lack of financi... | N/A | View |
EFTA00030972.pdf
An email dated January 4, 2010, between legal professionals discussing the admissibility of evidence in a child pornography distribution case. The sender describes forensic findings of a virtual reality game titled 'Hizashi no nakano real' found on the defendant's computer and asks if this interactive content is admissible in court. The document is marked with ID EFTA00030972.
DOJ-OGR-00014796.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from a legal proceeding filed on August 22, 2022. A judge details the calculation for a defendant's sentencing, arriving at a total offense level of 37, which corresponds to a prison sentence of 210-262 months and significant fines. A representative, Ms. Moe, raises a specific objection to the judge's calculation of offense levels under guideline 3D1.4.
DOJ-OGR-00001913.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020, in which the government argues against granting bail to a defendant. The prosecutor highlights the defendant's unexplained wealth, lack of community ties, and willingness to live in hiding as flight risks. The government finds it 'extremely surprising' that the defendant has proposed a bail package with no security, has refused to provide financial details about herself or her spouse, and proposes to live in a transient luxury hotel in Manhattan.
DOJ-OGR-00001168.jpg
This legal document is a filing by the Government arguing against a defendant's proposed bail package. The prosecution contends that the defendant is a significant flight risk because a new financial report reveals she has approximately $22 million in assets, far more than previously disclosed, including a $2 million London townhouse and over $4 million in unrestrained funds. The Government further argues that the bond is effectively worthless because two proposed co-signers are UK residents, against whom the bond could not be realistically recovered if the defendant were to flee.
DOJ-OGR-00000997.jpg
This legal document argues that a defendant should be denied bail and home confinement. The prosecution contends the defendant is a significant flight risk due to her access to over $20 million in financial resources, her refusal to account for this wealth, and her ability to maintain relationships remotely. The document cites several legal precedents to argue that GPS ankle-bracelet monitoring is not a reliable means of preventing flight.
DOJ-OGR-00000523.jpg
This legal document is a transcript from a court proceeding where the prosecution argues for the detention of a defendant, citing them as a significant flight risk due to vast financial assets, including a net worth over $500 million and a single bank account with over $110 million. The prosecution also states that the evidence against the defendant is already "strong" and is growing stronger daily as more victims and witnesses come forward following a months-long covert investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00021042.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated February 28, 2023, in which a judge explains the legal basis for applying specific sentencing enhancements to a defendant. The judge refutes the defendant's arguments that guideline 4B1.5(b) requires a finding of future danger and outlines the necessary factual findings for applying a leadership role enhancement under guideline 3B1.1(a).
DOJ-OGR-00016127.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. In it, a judge instructs the jury on fundamental principles of criminal law, including the presumption of innocence for the defendant and the government's burden to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The judge also explains their own role in deciding matters of law and the jury's future role in deliberating after all evidence is presented.
DOJ-OGR-00002237.jpg
This legal document is a court filing from December 30, 2020, detailing a defendant's new motion for bail. The defendant proposes a $28.5 million bail package, secured by property and cash, and co-signed by her spouse, friends, and family, to address the court's previous concerns about flight risk. The proposed conditions also include home confinement with GPS monitoring, custody by a family member, and travel restricted to the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00002186(1).jpg
This legal document argues for the defendant's detention by highlighting her deceptive behavior and flight risk. It cites her knowing disobedience of FBI directives when she fled, her attempts to evade law enforcement by wrapping a phone in tin foil, and her significant dishonesty regarding her financial assets, which are believed to be far greater than the $3.8 million she disclosed to Pretrial Services.
DOJ-OGR-00002180.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 18, 2020, argues that an unnamed defendant, who is a French citizen, would be completely protected from extradition to the United States if she were to flee to France. The argument is supported by direct communication from the French Ministry of Justice, which confirmed France's inflexible principle of not extraditing its citizens outside the European Union, and is further bolstered by a legal precedent from the 2013 case, United States v. Cilins.
DOJ-OGR-00002173(1).jpg
This legal document is a court filing arguing against granting bail to a defendant. The prosecution asserts that the defendant is a significant flight risk due to the potential for a 35-year prison sentence and that the three victims in the case unanimously wish for her to remain in detention. The filing emphasizes the strength of the government's evidence, which includes testimony from victims alleging the defendant groomed them for sexual activity with Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00001912.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020. In it, a prosecutor argues against granting bail to a defendant, claiming she has not been transparent about her finances. The prosecutor states the defendant placed millions of dollars in a trust controlled by a relative and a close associate, has wealth stored abroad, and failed to disclose this information, making her a significant flight risk who has not earned the court's trust.
DOJ-OGR-00021580.jpg
A page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) detailing an argument by defense attorney Mr. Everdell regarding sentencing guidelines. Everdell argues that background commentary from the Sentencing Commission should be considered authoritative, specifically arguing that his client does not fit the definition of a 'dangerous sex offender' because they have not re-offended in over 18 years. Prosecutor Ms. Moe declines to respond verbally, resting on the government's written briefing.
DOJ-OGR-00031314.jpg
This Probable Cause Affidavit, filed by Officer Nicholas Christ of the Palm Beach Police Department, details the arrest of an unnamed defendant on September 11, 2005. The officer initiated a traffic stop after observing a white Mitsubishi improperly parked and, upon approaching the vehicle with five occupants, detected the odor of marijuana. The defendant admitted to possessing marijuana and paraphernalia, which tested positive, leading to her arrest for possession.
DOJ-OGR-00019872.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 2, 2020, argues that an unnamed defendant is a significant flight risk and should be denied bail. The prosecution asserts that since an indictment against Epstein was unsealed in July 2019, the defendant has been actively hiding, using an alias ('G Max'), changing phone numbers, and purchasing a 156-acre property in New Hampshire with cash through an anonymized LLC. The document concludes that due to her international connections, financial means, and lack of ties to the U.S., no bail conditions could reasonably assure her appearance in court.
DOJ-OGR-00019869.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 2, 2020, argues for the detention of a 58-year-old defendant, asserting they are a significant flight risk. The argument is based on the severity of the alleged crimes involving multiple minors, a potential 35-year prison sentence, and the strength of the evidence, which includes victim testimony corroborated by flight records, diaries, and business records. The document also confirms that the charges are timely under the amended statute of limitations.
DOJ-OGR-00010569.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that a defendant's actions satisfy the requirements for a 'covered sex crime' under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. The prosecution asserts that the defendant engaged in a pattern of prohibited sexual conduct, including transporting victims (Jane) and non-consensual touching (Jane and Carolyn), justifying a sentencing enhancement. The document refutes the defendant's claim that the guideline is inapplicable, citing case law and the original congressional intent to ensure lengthy incarceration for such offenders.
DOJ-OGR-00010379.jpg
This legal document details how the Defendant and Epstein used financial gifts and payments as a method of grooming victims like Jane and Annie, paying for things like lessons, school, and promising trips. The document also discusses the geographic scope of the criminal conspiracy, noting that while specific counts focused on New York and Florida, witnesses testified to sexual conduct occurring in New Mexico and London as well. The text highlights the testimony of victims, including Carolyn and Virginia Roberts, who were paid for sexualized massages.
DOJ-OGR-00002771.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 22, 2021, is a portion of a court filing discussing the legal standards for a defendant's bail motion. It outlines the rebuttable presumption of detention under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3), detailing the defendant's burden of production and the government's ultimate burden of persuasion. The document notes that the defendant has filed a third motion for bail, arguing for reconsideration based on new conditions and a purportedly weakened government case.
DOJ-OGR-00020093.jpg
This legal document, filed by the Government, refutes the defense's claim that the defendant cannot adequately prepare for trial while detained at the MDC. The Government outlines the measures taken to ensure access to discovery materials and legal counsel, including providing hard drives, a dedicated laptop, and arranging for daily video calls with her lawyer. The document argues that these provisions, despite pandemic-related restrictions, are sufficient for trial preparation.
DOJ-OGR-00020089.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 18, 2020, argues for the continued detention of a female defendant, asserting she is a significant flight risk due to her financial means, foreign ties, and skill at hiding. The filing dismisses proposed bail conditions, such as private security guards and GPS monitoring, as insufficient to ensure her appearance in court. To support its position, the document cites several past federal cases (Banki, Zarger, Benatar) where courts denied bail under similar circumstances, deeming electronic monitoring and home confinement inadequate for high-risk defendants.
DOJ-OGR-00020076.jpg
This legal document is a court filing arguing against granting bail to a defendant. The prosecution asserts the defendant is a flight risk due to significant foreign ties, including citizenship in three countries, multiple passports, and foreign assets. The document argues her ties to the United States are weak, citing her lack of employment and dependents, and points to inconsistent statements she made about her marriage to undermine her claims of stability.
DOJ-OGR-00031073.jpg
This is a probable cause affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department detailing the arrest of an individual on September 11, 2005. Officer Nicholas Christo initiated a traffic stop on a white Mitsubishi and, upon detecting the odor of marijuana, questioned the occupants. The defendant admitted to possessing marijuana and paraphernalia, leading to her arrest on charges of possession.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017908.jpg
This document is a page from a Westlaw legal database printout (dated 2019) referencing the 2005 case 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001'. It contains legal headnotes [20-24] summarizing court rulings on Federal Civil Procedure, personal jurisdiction over foreign terrorist entities/charities, and requirements for RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) claims. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation, potentially serving as legal precedent or research within that file.
Marital status
At the time of her arrest, the defendant told Pretrial Services she was 'in the process of divorcing her husband.'
Phone number registration
The defendant switched her primary phone number and registered it under the alias 'G Max' to avoid detection.
No Subject
The defendant switched her email address as part of intentional efforts to avoid detection.
No Subject
The defendant ordered packages for delivery with a different person listed on the shipping label to avoid detection.
Defendant's finances
The defendant was interviewed by Pretrial Services and the Court regarding her assets, during which she was allegedly 'less than candid'.
Personal circumstances
The defendant stated to Pretrial Services in July that she has no children and no current employment.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity