DOJ-OGR-00009358.jpg

420 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 420 KB
Summary

This document is page 297 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Brune by attorney Mr. Davis. The questioning focuses on a previous statement made by Ms. Trzaskoma regarding a 'suspension opinion' and a 'Westlaw report' that came to light before voir dire. Mr. Davis is pressing the witness to confirm that a Westlaw report was attached to a letter submitted to the court.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Ms. Brune Witness
Under direct examination, testifying about the submission of a letter and awareness of facts.
Mr. Davis Attorney
Conducting the examination of Ms. Brune.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the proceedings, granting Mr. Davis time.
Mr. Wooten Court Staff/Technician
Asked by Mr. Davis to display Government Exhibit 9.
Ms. Trzaskoma Person mentioned
Quoted in the transcript regarding a statement made to the Court about submitting a letter.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Westlaw
Referenced in relation to a 'Westlaw report'.
Government
Referenced via 'Government Exhibit 9'.

Timeline (3 events)

2022-02-24
Court filing date of the document.
Court
Unknown
Direct examination of witness Ms. Brune regarding previous statements and filings.
Courtroom
Unknown
Voir dire
Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction implied by the court reporter's name.

Relationships (2)

Ms. Brune Adversarial/Legal Mr. Davis
Davis is questioning Brune in court, pushing for 'yes or no' answers.
Ms. Brune Professional/Colleague Ms. Trzaskoma
Brune is testifying about Trzaskoma's actions and statements ('we worked very hard').

Key Quotes (4)

"What she did was what the judge had sort of given people the option of saying that they would do, which is that she said that she would submit a letter, and then we worked very hard to submit a letter that was accurate."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009358.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor, we were not aware of the facts that have come to light, and I think if your Honor deems it appropriate, we can submit a letter"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009358.jpg
Quote #2
"One of the facts that had come to light was the very same suspension opinion that she had found before voir dire ever started, correct?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009358.jpg
Quote #3
"The question is, one of the facts that came to light that you attached was the Westlaw report, correct?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009358.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document