DOJ-OGR-00008390.jpg
737 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
6
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
737 KB
Summary
This legal document, page 4 of a court filing dated December 15, 2021, details the Court's rejection of the Defense's request to allow a witness to testify under a pseudonym. The Court finds the request untimely, notes that other legal tools like a letter rogatory were available to compel testimony, and distinguishes the case from precedents involving undercover officers whose safety or operational effectiveness would be compromised by revealing their identity.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brennerman | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant in a cited case, United States v. Brennerman.
|
| Lee | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant in a cited case, United States v. Lee.
|
| Alimehmeti | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant in a cited case, United States v. Alimehmeti.
|
| Hernandez | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant in a cited case, United States v. Hernandez.
|
| Schulte | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant in a cited case, United States v. Schulte.
|
Organizations (6)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | Government agency |
A party in the legal case, opposing the Defense's request.
|
| Defense | Legal team |
A party in the legal case, making a request for witness pseudonymity.
|
| Second Circuit | Court |
A U.S. Court of Appeals whose decisions are cited as precedent.
|
| Court | Court |
The judicial body making the ruling described in the document.
|
| CIA | Government agency |
Mentioned in a cited case where a covert CIA officer testified under a pseudonym.
|
| United States | Government |
Named as the plaintiff in several cited legal cases (e.g., United States v. Brennerman).
|
Timeline (3 events)
The Government rested its case.
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as a location from which testimony could be secured via a letter rogatory in a cited case.
|
|
|
Southern District of New York, the court district for several cited cases.
|
Relationships (1)
The document outlines the Government's opposition to a request made by the Defense regarding witness testimony, and the Court's ruling on the matter.
Key Quotes (1)
"secure testimony from the United Kingdom"Source
โ Court (citing United States v. Brennerman)
(Describing the function of the legal mechanism under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1781 for a criminal defendant.)
DOJ-OGR-00008390.jpg
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document