DOJ-OGR-00019226.jpg
627 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
627 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on July 2, 2020, presents an argument for the partial closure of court proceedings due to the public health risks of COVID-19. It cites statistics on the virus's spread in New Hampshire and nationally to emphasize the danger to all participants. The document references the case 'United States v. Smith' as a legal precedent for policies that constitute a partial closure of a courtroom for security or safety reasons.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Smith | Party in a legal case |
Mentioned in the legal citation 'United States v. Smith, 426 F.3d 567, 572-73 (2d Cir. 2005)'.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| N.H. Dep’t of Health and Human Servs. | government agency |
Cited as a source for COVID-19 data in New Hampshire.
|
| N.H. Pub. Radio | media organization |
Cited as a source for tracking COVID-19 data in New Hampshire.
|
| Real Clear Politics | media organization |
Cited as a source for national COVID-19 statistics.
|
| U.S. Marshal's | government agency |
Mentioned in relation to a policy requiring photo identification for court visitors.
|
| United States | government |
Mentioned as a party in the legal case 'United States v. Smith'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2001-09-11
A U.S. Marshal's policy was implemented after September 11th requiring unknown visitors to court to produce photo identification.
courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the context of local COVID-19 statistics.
|
Relationships (1)
The document cites the legal case 'United States v. Smith'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document