| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-09-11 | Policy implementation | A U.S. Marshal's policy was implemented after September 11th requiring unknown visitors to court ... | courtroom | View |
| 2001-09-11 | Policy implementation context | The document references a U.S. Marshal's policy requiring photo identification for court visitors... | N/A | View |
This legal document, filed on July 2, 2020, presents an argument for the partial closure of court proceedings due to the public health risks of COVID-19. It cites statistics on the virus's spread in New Hampshire and nationally to emphasize the danger to all participants. The document references the case 'United States v. Smith' as a legal precedent for policies that constitute a partial closure of a courtroom for security or safety reasons.
This page from a legal document, filed on July 2, 2020, argues for a partial courtroom closure due to the public health risks of COVID-19. It cites statistics on the virus's spread in New Hampshire and nationally, and references the legal precedent from 'United States v. Smith' concerning a U.S. Marshal's policy implemented after September 11th.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity