DOJ-OGR-00009425.jpg

417 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 417 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from February 24, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a former Assistant U.S. Attorney named Schoeman. The questioning centers on what Schoeman knew about allegations that Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, was a suspended attorney, referencing a potential Westlaw report and an internal firm email he claims not to have seen. Schoeman maintains he was unaware of the specific information and only took action by asking about the voir dire.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Schoeman Witness / Former Assistant U.S. Attorney
The individual being cross-examined, addressed as Mr. Schoeman.
Catherine Conrad Juror No. 1
Identified as Juror No. 1, who is the subject of the questioning.
Theresa Trzaskoma
Mentioned as a potential source of information for Mr. Schoeman.
Juror No. 1 Juror
A juror in a case, identified as Catherine Conrad, who is allegedly a suspended attorney.
Unnamed suspended attorney Suspended Attorney
An individual who Juror No. 1 is suspected of being.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Westlaw Company
Mentioned as the source of a report containing information about Juror No. 1.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
U.S. Attorney's Office Government agency
Implied by Mr. Schoeman's former role as an "Assistant U.S. Attorney".

Timeline (1 events)

2022-02-24
Cross-examination of Mr. Schoeman regarding his knowledge of information connecting Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, to a suspended attorney.
Southern District Court (implied)
Schoeman Unnamed Questioner (Attorney)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied location of the court proceeding, as indicated by the court reporting agency's name.

Relationships (1)

Juror No. 1 (Catherine Conrad) Alleged identity Unnamed suspended attorney
The questioning is based on the premise that Juror No. 1 might be the same person as a suspended attorney.

Key Quotes (3)

"Jesus, I think Juror No. 1 is the suspended attorney"
Source
— Unnamed female individual (An exclamation allegedly made by an unnamed woman in a communication within her firm.)
DOJ-OGR-00009425.jpg
Quote #1
"I'll stipulate with you."
Source
— Schoeman (Mr. Schoeman's response to the questioner's statement that he was a "terrific investigator".)
DOJ-OGR-00009425.jpg
Quote #2
"I don't know what I would have done. I guess I can only tell you what I did do, which was ask about the voir dire."
Source
— Schoeman (His response to a hypothetical question about what he would have done had he seen an email with the exclamation about the juror.)
DOJ-OGR-00009425.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document