U.S. Attorney's Office
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe Number One
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sunny Drescher
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Employment affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witness
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sunny Drescher
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alicia Valle
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Referral |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Bureau of Prisons
|
Institutional friction |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BOP
|
Institutional conflict |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
THOMAS
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein's counsel
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BOP
|
Professional interagency |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Two Guards
|
Subject of deferred prosecution agreement agreed to interviews |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
BOP
|
Governmental administrative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutorial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
|
Institutional conflict |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial collusive plea deal |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Bureau of Prisons
|
Governmental organizational |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BOP
|
Inter agency |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
|
Informant collaborator |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Agreement regarding Epstein's charges, sentencing, and victim representation. Includes terms for ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein agreed to plead guilty in Florida state court to soliciting minors for prostitution and s... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Interviews of two guards with U.S. Attorney's Office and DOJ-OIG as part of an ongoing OIG invest... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Opening of the case/Investigation | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's attorneys approached U.S. Attorney's Office to resolve federal investigation. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-prosecution agreement granting immunity | Federal Court/DOJ | View |
| N/A | N/A | U.S. Attorney's Office agreed not to charge Epstein with federal crimes and not to bring criminal... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of non-prosecution agreement. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office officially identified 36 women as victims. | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-05 | N/A | Transfer of discovery production | U.S. Attorney's Office SDNY | View |
| 2021-04-14 | N/A | Government Discovery Production 7 | USAfx (Digital Upload) | View |
| 2021-04-14 | N/A | Discovery Production 7 | SDNY (via Email/USAfx) | View |
| 2020-08-01 | N/A | Grand Jury Investigation into the conduct of the defendant and other possible co-conspirators of ... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-08-01 | N/A | Grand Jury Investigation | Unknown | View |
| 2019-08-10 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein death / suicide attempt | Federal Prison / Hospital | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Bail submission due date (referred to as 'due Friday' relative to the email date of Thursday, Jul... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-02-21 | N/A | District Judge in Miami issues opinion finding victims' rights were violated in the Epstein case ... | Miami | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Epstein charged in SDNY; Epstein death at MCC; dismissal of case against Epstein. | SDNY / MCC | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | A victim met with the U.S. Attorney's Office. | Unknown | View |
| 2012-11-08 | N/A | Sen. Alvin Williams Jr. was arrested by federal agents. His chief of staff, Kim Blackett, was als... | St. Thomas, V.I. | View |
| 2012-11-08 | N/A | Sen. Alvin Williams Jr. and his chief of staff, Kim Blackett, were arrested by FBI agents. A fede... | St. Thomas, V.I. | View |
| 2011-09-01 | N/A | Judge Kenneth Marra rules that U.S. Attorney's Office should have notified victims. | Federal Court | View |
| 2010-08-01 | N/A | Investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's activities involving molestation of underage girls. | Palm Beach | View |
| 2010-07-20 | N/A | Narrator received victim notification letter regarding Rothstein case. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2008-07-10 | N/A | Final list of thirty-two victims provided to Mr. Goldberger via certified mail. | N/A | View |
007.pdf
Bail disposition form for Michael Thomas, a correctional officer charged in connection with Jeffrey Epstein's death. Thomas pleaded not guilty on November 19, 2019, and was released on a $100,000 Personal Recognizance Bond with travel restrictions limited to NY/NJ. Specific handwritten conditions prohibit excessive alcohol use and contact with his co-defendant (Tova Noel) without counsel present.
006.pdf
This document is a Bail Disposition form from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) for defendant Tova Noel, dated November 19, 2019. Noel, represented by James E. Foy, voluntarily surrendered, pled not guilty, and was released on a $100,000 Personal Recognizance Bond signed by two financially responsible persons. Conditions of release include travel restrictions to NY/NJ/PA, surrender of travel documents, pretrial supervision, mental health evaluation, and a specific prohibition on contacting her co-defendant without counsel present.
005.pdf
This is a bail disposition and arraignment form from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) for Jeffrey Epstein, filed on July 8, 2019. It records his arrest on July 6, 2019, his plea of 'Not Guilty' during arraignment, and orders him detained until a detention hearing scheduled for July 11, 2019. He is represented by retained counsel Martin Weinberg, and the government is represented by AUSA Alex Rossmiller.
091.pdf
A court order from the Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal dated July 1, 2009, in the case of Jeffrey Epstein v. State of Florida. The court granted Epstein's motion to file under seal and stayed a previous June 25, 2009 order that had granted a motion to unseal documents. The State (Respondent) was ordered to show cause within 10 days why Epstein's petition should not be granted.
068.pdf
This document is a Mandate from the Fourth District Court of Appeal of Florida, dated September 18, 2009, regarding the case of Jeffrey Epstein v. State of Florida. The mandate follows an opinion issued on September 2, 2009, where the court affirmed the lower court's decision, treating Epstein's petition for writ of certiorari as a full appeal. The document lists numerous attorneys involved, including R. Alexander Acosta on the distribution list, and identifies Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. as an appellee alongside the State and a redacted party.
025.pdf
This document is an unopposed motion filed on November 29, 2010, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team requesting a 10-day extension to respond to two plaintiff motions regarding protective orders and evidence preservation. The motion states that the parties are currently in discussions to resolve the matters and that plaintiff's counsel, Gary Farmer, does not oppose the extension. The document lists M.J. as the plaintiff and Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen as defendants.
017-19.pdf
Plaintiff Jane Doe filed an emergency motion to hold Jeffrey Epstein in contempt for failing to comply with discovery orders in a civil case (08-CV-80893). The motion alleges that Epstein failed to produce state criminal discovery materials and provided only heavily redacted correspondence with the U.S. Attorney's Office, obscuring the defense counsel's side of the communications. Doe seeks immediate production of unredacted documents, sanctions of $5,000 against Epstein's counsel, and a ruling that withheld materials be deemed admissible at trial.
020.pdf
This document is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team on June 16, 2010, in the case of L.M. v. Epstein. Epstein's lawyers argue the case should be dismissed because the plaintiff failed to serve the complaint within the required 120 days (Rule 4(m)). Furthermore, the motion alleges that the complaint filed by L.M. (represented by Bradley Edwards) was used as a prop in Scott Rothstein's massive $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme to lure investors with fabricated settlement agreements. The document cites depositions where L.M. contradicts allegations made in her complaint regarding sexual acts and travel.
003.pdf
This document is a 'Motion to Proceed Anonymously' filed on July 24, 2009, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 09-CV-81092). The plaintiff, identified as 'L.M.', is a 20-year-old female alleging she was sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein between the ages of 14 and 17. The motion argues that her identity should be protected due to the sensitive nature of the allegations and notes she was previously identified as a victim by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's office in a criminal investigation against Epstein.
006.pdf
This document is a court order from August 5, 2008, in the case of Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. Judge Kenneth A. Marra denied the defendants' motion to file documents under seal, ruling that the U.S. Attorney's objections and confidentiality clauses did not outweigh the public's right to access court records, ordering the clerk to unseal specific docket entries.
028-02.pdf
This document is a formal legal letter dated May 15, 2009, from Robert C. Josefsberg of Podhurst Orseck to Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys (Robert Critton and Jack Goldberger). The letter demands the immediate preservation of all evidence, particularly electronically stored information (ESI), relevant to pending civil actions by victims of Epstein's sexual exploitation. It specifically references the Non-Prosecution Agreement, the 2005 FBI raid, and warns that failure to preserve data could result in sanctions for spoliation.
014-01.pdf
This document is a 'Motion to Proceed Anonymously' filed on April 17, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida by Jane Doe No. 101 against Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff, represented by Podhurst Orseck, P.A., requests to use a pseudonym because she was sexually abused by Epstein as a minor and wishes to avoid further psychological trauma and public humiliation. The motion notes that Epstein already knows her identity from the related criminal investigation and cites precedents where other victims (Jane Does 1-7, etc.) were granted anonymity.
EFTA00037804.pdf
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York (dated March 16, 2019) discussing the logistics of transferring physical evidence related to the 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein) investigation. The prosecutor instructs that evidence should be moved to their location, with the specific exception of four massage tables (Green, Peach, Beige, and Brown) due to their size. The sender also queries the significance of parenthetical numbers found in the evidence list.
EFTA00032906.pdf
This document is an 'Access to Justice' email newsletter from Law360 dated April 20, 2020. It aggregates various legal news stories, primarily focused on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the justice system, including court closures, remote hearings, and bankruptcy issues. It is relevant to the Epstein files because it contains a summary of a recent Eleventh Circuit ruling that the Crime Victims' Rights Act protections do not arise until after a formal criminal charge is filed, which is described as a blow to Epstein's victims.
EFTA00032513.pdf
An email thread from February 21, 2019, involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The correspondents discuss the status of an ongoing trial presided over by Judge Sweet. Notably, one participant offers to send a 'draft Epstein thing' to the other as a distraction while they wait in the trial room.
EFTA00032510.pdf
This document is an email dated February 12, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to an individual in the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR). The AUSA identifies themselves as working on the current investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and requests a meeting or call for deconfliction purposes regarding their respective matters.
EFTA00032020.pdf
This document is an email dated September 14, 2021, sent by a Paralegal Specialist at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The email conveys an Excel attachment titled '!Photos_for_GX_from_Griffeye_export_updated.xlsx', which likely contains a log of photo evidence (possibly Government Exhibits 'GX') exported from Griffeye forensic software, likely in preparation for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.
EFTA00031936.pdf
A printout of a New York Post article dated October 9, 2007, detailing efforts by Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer, Gerald Lefcourt, to avoid sex offender registration for Epstein. The article cites a drafted but unsent letter to U.S. Attorney Alexander Costa (likely Acosta) claiming registration would be inappropriate and have a profound impact on Epstein. It also notes Epstein's past business partnership with Mort Zuckerman.
EFTA00031717.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, dated August 21, 2019. It confirms the filing of a 'FRAP 42 STIPULATION, with prejudice' in the case of United States of America v. Epstein (Case No. 19-2221). The notice lists attorneys Martin G. Weinberg and Reid Weingarten as recipients, along with several redacted Assistant U.S. Attorneys.
EFTA00031681.pdf
This document is an email chain dated July 8, 2019, between members of the Southern District of New York (SDNY) U.S. Attorney's Office. They are discussing the finalization of a 'Detention memo' for 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein), specifically noting substantive changes on pages 10-11 and coordinating its submission to the court.
EFTA00031318.pdf
This document is an email dated February 28, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a redacted recipient. The subject is 'subpoena stuff,' and it includes attachments related to an unsealing application and order (referencing case 17_Civ_0616 and 'JE', likely Jeffrey Epstein) and an iterative NDO (Non-Disclosure Order) and subpoena. The sender provides these documents, noting that one item was sent by a third party (name redacted) and might be useful.
EFTA00030829.pdf
This document is an email chain dated July 9, 2019, involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York and attorney Michael Bachner. The AUSA is following up on a conversation regarding the Epstein investigation, providing contact information for the prosecution team, and attaching both the previously filed Florida non-prosecution agreement and a blank proffer agreement for Bachner to review with his (redacted) client.
EFTA00030781.pdf
This document is an automatic email reply dated January 9, 2020, with the subject line 'Epstein'. The sender informs the recipient they are out of the office and directs inquiries regarding 'Human Trafficking' matters to a specific Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA), and other inquiries to a different AUSA. The specific names are redacted.
EFTA00030751.pdf
An email dated November 9, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding 'Epstein production.' The attorney is asking a colleague for a summary of materials provided to a redacted third party, noting that the third party claimed they were missing some items.
EFTA00030511.pdf
An email dated July 30, 2019, circulating a South Florida Sun Sentinel article. The article discusses the legal conflict regarding Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement in Florida, noting that while some victims want new charges in Florida following his New York arrest, prosecutors argue others wish to avoid reopening the case to protect their privacy. Lawyers for victims Jane Doe 1 and 2 argue that the privacy concerns of some should not prevent the prosecution of Epstein and his co-conspirators.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity