HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021830.jpg

1.29 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Deposition transcript (rough draft)
File Size: 1.29 MB
Summary

This document is a page from a rough draft of a deposition transcript marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp. The dialogue involves an attorney questioning a witness about legal standards, specifically regarding a 'motion to strike' filed by Professor Dershowitz and the ethical requirement for attorneys to have a 'good-faith basis' when asking leading questions. The witness confirms their team's position regarding the motion and agrees generally with the premise regarding good-faith questioning.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Alan Dershowitz Subject of legal motion
Mentioned as 'Professor Dershowitz', who filed a 'motion to strike'.
Unknown Speaker Q Interrogator/Attorney
Asking questions regarding legal procedure and ethics.
Unknown Speaker A Witness
Answering questions regarding their legal team's position on Dershowitz's motion.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
House Oversight Committee
Implied by Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
Courts
General reference to judicial bodies handling motions.

Timeline (1 events)

Unknown
Deposition testimony regarding legal ethics and a motion to strike.
Unknown
Speaker Q Speaker A

Relationships (1)

Speaker A (Witness) Legal Adversary Alan Dershowitz
Speaker A refers to 'our response to Professor Dershowitz's motion to strike'.

Key Quotes (3)

"That was our position in our response to Professor Dershowitz's motion to strike, yes."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021830.jpg
Quote #1
"does the attorney have to have a good-faith basis to believe that that question is true or the facts assumed in that question are true?"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021830.jpg
Quote #2
"you don't ask a leading question about a fact unless you have a good-faith basis to believe that facts is true, correct?"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021830.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document