This document is page 11 of a rough draft deposition transcript, marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp. The dialogue involves a legal questioning regarding the ethics of including allegations of misconduct in legal pleadings. The witness clarifies the distinction between 'relevant' and 'pertinent' and references Federal Rule 11 regarding the requirement that allegations must not be frivolous.
This document is a page from a rough draft of a deposition transcript marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp. The dialogue involves an attorney questioning a witness about legal standards, specifically regarding a 'motion to strike' filed by Professor Dershowitz and the ethical requirement for attorneys to have a 'good-faith basis' when asking leading questions. The witness confirms their team's position regarding the motion and agrees generally with the premise regarding good-faith questioning.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity