DOJ-OGR-00008917.jpg

412 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court order / legal filing (case 1:20-cr-00330-pae)
File Size: 412 KB
Summary

This document is page 2 of a court order from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), dated February 11, 2022. Judge Alison J. Nathan outlines the requirements for filing amicus briefs (specifically mentioning NACDL) and notes that the Defendant's motion for a new trial became fully briefed on February 9, 2022. The Judge states the Court will rule expeditiously and will not delay its ruling for forthcoming amicus briefs.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge
Judge issuing the order regarding amicus briefs and the motion for a new trial.
The Defendant Defendant
Subject of the motion for a new trial which became fully briefed on Feb 9, 2022. (Contextually known to be Ghislaine ...

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
The Court
United States District Court (SDNY implied by location and judge).
NACDL
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; entity seeking leave to file an amicus brief.
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated by footer stamp DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (2 events)

February 11, 2022
Judge Nathan issues order regarding amicus briefs and timing of ruling.
New York, New York
February 9, 2022
The Defendant's motion for a new trial became fully briefed.
New York, New York

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location where the order was signed and issued.

Relationships (1)

Alison J. Nathan Judge/Defendant The Defendant
Judge Nathan is issuing orders regarding the Defendant's motion for a new trial.

Key Quotes (3)

"The Court provides one note of caution regarding timing."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008917.jpg
Quote #1
"The Court will not delay issuing a ruling if ready to do so simply because an authorized amicus brief is forthcoming."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008917.jpg
Quote #2
"If NACDL still seeks leave to file an amicus brief, it may submit a renewed motion consistent with this Order."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008917.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document