NACDL
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
public defenders
|
Membership |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
defense counsel
|
Membership |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
private criminal defense lawyers
|
Membership |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
law professors
|
Membership |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Election judges
|
Membership |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Caproni
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Third party support amicus |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 614 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Court | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Court Order regarding NACDL request to file amicus brief. | Court | View |
| 2022-02-09 | N/A | Date of the letter requesting leave to file amicus curiae. | Washington, DC | View |
| 1958-01-01 | Founding | NACDL was founded | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000203.tif
This document, likely a legal brief or argument, discusses the importance of the government upholding its promises in plea agreements. It argues that the NACDL urges the Court to ensure the government honors its commitments to defendants, especially given the significant rights defendants waive when entering such agreements. The text emphasizes that courts should enforce these promises to maintain fairness and trust in the legal system.
DOJ-OGR-00015257.tif
This document is a multi-year schedule of events, lectures, and conferences from 2016 to 2021, with some events listed as 'forthcoming'. It details participation in various academic, psychological, and scientific associations and institutions across the US and internationally, often as a speaker or lecturer. Many events from 2020 and 2021 are noted as being conducted 'via zoom'.
DOJ-OGR-00015250.tif
This document is a list of professional activities and speaking engagements from 1994 and 1995, likely from a CV. It details conferences, seminars, grand rounds, and workshops with their host organizations and locations across the US, Canada, Europe, and Asia. Key themes include psychology, law, trauma, memory, and sexual abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00020466.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426) related to the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from February 4, 2022, to February 16, 2022. It details various legal proceedings including orders on sealing documents, motions for a new trial, letters from both the prosecution and defense, and issues concerning the intervention of "Juror 50" and amicus briefs.
DOJ-OGR-00009118.jpg
This document is the conclusion of a legal filing, dated February 24, 2022, arguing for a new trial based on juror bias. The attorneys contend that "Juror 50" exhibited both implied and inferred bias due to past experiences and media statements, rendering them unfit to serve despite claims of impartiality. The filing cites legal precedents, including phrases from Chief Justice Marshall, to argue that the juror should have been disqualified to protect the defendant's right to a fair trial.
DOJ-OGR-00009112.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal filing (Document 614) submitted on February 24, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The text, likely from the NACDL, argues that high-profile trials create pressure on jurors to convict for fame or to avoid public scorn, citing the 'stealth juror' phenomenon. It specifically alleges that 'Juror 50' in the Maxwell trial used social media to express appreciation for gratitude received for convicting Maxwell, and compares the situation to historical cases like O.J. Simpson and Rodney King.
DOJ-OGR-00008969.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Document 604) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on February 17, 2022. The filing party, NACDL, argues for the importance of its perspective in the case, citing legal precedents like Skilling v. United States regarding jury selection and other cases concerning the role of amicus curiae (friends of the court). The document aims to persuade the court to consider its suggestions on ensuring juror honesty and establishing a fair framework for the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00008919.jpg
This legal document, dated February 9, 2022, from Winston & Strawn LLP, describes the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) and its practice of filing amicus curiae briefs. It cites legal precedents for amicus participation and requests the Court's permission to file an amicus brief regarding a motion for a new trial based on juror misconduct. The document notes that Counsel for the Defendant has consented, while Counsel for the DOJ has not yet responded to inquiries.
DOJ-OGR-00008917.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court order from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), dated February 11, 2022. Judge Alison J. Nathan outlines the requirements for filing amicus briefs (specifically mentioning NACDL) and notes that the Defendant's motion for a new trial became fully briefed on February 9, 2022. The Judge states the Court will rule expeditiously and will not delay its ruling for forthcoming amicus briefs.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017708.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely authored by Paul Cassell) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and criticizing the NACDL's stance on cross-examining victims. It argues against giving defendants the right to cross-examine victims regarding their status, citing potential trauma and lack of legal precedent. The document bears the name "David Schoen" (Epstein's former attorney) and a "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT" Bates stamp, indicating it was likely submitted as evidence or discovery material during a congressional investigation into the Epstein case, possibly regarding the non-prosecution agreement and violations of victims' rights.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity