DOJ-OGR-00002355(3).jpg
746 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
5
Events
3
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
746 KB
Summary
This legal document describes the contentious discovery phase of a lawsuit between Giuffre and Maxwell. It notes that Giuffre's law firm, Boies Schiller, attempted to turn the suit into a 'proxy prosecution of Epstein' and sought to add a 'law enforcement' exception to a court-mandated Protective Order, which Maxwell rejected. The case ultimately settled before trial, rendering certain provisions of the Protective Order moot.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Giuffre | Public figure / Litigant |
A party in a lawsuit against Maxwell, described as having an 'uphill battle' and whose lawyers sought to turn the law...
|
| Epstein |
Mentioned as the target of a 'proxy prosecution' via the lawsuit involving Giuffre.
|
|
| Maxwell | Litigant |
A party in a lawsuit with Giuffre, subject to discovery of private information, and who rejected a proposed provision...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Boies Schiller | Law firm |
Identified as the law firm representing Giuffre. They sought to add a 'law enforcement' exception to a Protective Order.
|
| government | Government agency |
Mentioned in the context of Boies Schiller being 'eager to enlist the government in its campaign against Maxwell'.
|
| law enforcement | Government agency |
Mentioned in a proposed exception to a Protective Order that would allow confidential information to be used for 'inv...
|
Timeline (5 events)
Boies Schiller proposed adding a 'law enforcement' exception to the Protective Order, which Maxwell rejected.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Cited in a legal reference (Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 46, 51 (2d Cir. 2019)) indicating the jurisdiction of a re...
|
Relationships (3)
They were opposing parties in a lawsuit (Brown v. Maxwell) involving 'bitter, hard-fought' discovery.
Giuffre's lawsuit against Maxwell is described as a 'proxy prosecution of Epstein'.
The document refers to 'her lawyers at Boies Schiller'.
Key Quotes (5)
"hard-fought"Source
— Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 46, 51 (2d Cir. 2019)
(Describing the nature of the discovery process in the case.)
DOJ-OGR-00002355(3).jpg
Quote #1
"extensive"Source
— Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 46, 51 (2d Cir. 2019)
(Describing the nature of the discovery process in the case.)
DOJ-OGR-00002355(3).jpg
Quote #2
"thousands of pages"Source
— Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 46, 51 (2d Cir. 2019)
(Describing the total volume of the court file from the discovery process.)
DOJ-OGR-00002355(3).jpg
Quote #3
"law enforcement"Source
— Boies Schiller (proposed)
(The type of exception Boies Schiller sought to add to the Protective Order.)
DOJ-OGR-00002355(3).jpg
Quote #4
"CONFIDENTIAL information shall not be disclosed or used for any purpose except the preparation and trial of this case and any related matter, including but not limited to, investigations by law enforcement."Source
— Boies Schiller (proposed)
(The specific provision proposed by Boies Schiller to be included in the Protective Order, which was rejected by Maxwell.)
DOJ-OGR-00002355(3).jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document