DOJ-OGR-00002368(1).jpg
717 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (motion for evidentiary hearing/suppression)
File Size:
717 KB
Summary
This document is page 16 (filed page 21 of 23) of a defense motion in the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell* (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. The defense argues for an evidentiary hearing to investigate alleged coordination between the government and a redacted third party who provided Maxwell's 2016 civil deposition transcripts to 'stir up a criminal prosecution.' The motion requests the suppression of evidence obtained from this redacted party, specifically the April and July 2016 depositions, and the dismissal of Counts Five and Six.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant/Movant |
Requesting an evidentiary hearing and suppression of evidence regarding the government's coordination with a redacted...
|
| The Prosecutor | Government Representative |
Accused of potentially knowing (or being reckless in not knowing) about a redacted party's efforts to stir up prosecu...
|
| [REDACTED] | Witness/Informant (Implied) |
Name redacted; approached the prosecutor's office to 'stir up a criminal prosecution' and 'dangled the deposition tra...
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court (S.D.N.Y.) |
The court handling Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.
|
|
| Prosecutor's Office |
Received information and depositions from the redacted party.
|
|
| Chemical Bank |
Referenced in legal argument regarding 'Chemical Bank collusion' (referring to a legal standard/precedent).
|
|
| DOJ-OGR |
Source of the document (footer stamp).
|
Timeline (3 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Southern District of New York (cited in case law).
|
Relationships (1)
Defense argues the prosecutor coordinated with the redacted party prior to the grand jury subpoena.
Key Quotes (3)
"prosecutor knew (or was reckless in not knowing) that [REDACTED] had previously approached his office... in an effort to stir up a criminal prosecution and dangled the deposition transcripts as a carrot"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002368(1).jpg
Quote #1
"suppress the April and July 2016 depositions and all evidence derived therefrom"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002368(1).jpg
Quote #2
"no Chemical Bank collusion had occurred"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002368(1).jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document