DOJ-OGR-00020090.jpg

751 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing / government response to motion for reconsideration
File Size: 751 KB
Summary

This document is page 27 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on December 18, 2020. The text argues against the defense's motion for reconsideration of bail, stating the Court has already rejected comparisons to other high-profile cases (Esposito, Dreier, Madoff). The prosecution highlights the defendant's 'significant foreign connections' and 'sophistication in hiding those resources and herself' as reasons for continued detention.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Referred to as 'the defendant' (identified by Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Subject of the bail hearing and detention orde...
Esposito Legal Precedent Subject
Referenced in United States v. Esposito; used by defense to argue for bail, distinguished by the Court.
Dreier Legal Precedent Subject
Referenced in United States v. Dreier; used by defense to argue for bail.
Madoff Legal Precedent Subject
Referenced in United States v. Madoff; used by defense to argue for bail, distinguished by the Court.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York; the court jurisdiction cited in case law.
DOJ
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
The Court
The judicial body deciding on the bail motion.

Timeline (2 events)

2020-07-14
Initial bail hearing
Court
The Court The Defense The Government
2020-12-18
Document Filing Date
Court Docket

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the cited legal cases.

Relationships (1)

Defendant (Maxwell) Adversarial/Legal Government
Government arguing against defense motion for bail.

Key Quotes (4)

"the defendant not only has significant financial resources, but has demonstrated sophistication in hiding those resources and herself."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020090.jpg
Quote #1
"A motion for reconsideration may not be used . . . as a vehicle for relitigating issues already decided by the Court."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020090.jpg
Quote #2
"significant foreign connections"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020090.jpg
Quote #3
"crucial factual differences"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020090.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document