Madoff
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal case | A case involving a defendant named Madoff, with allegations involving hundreds of millions of dol... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001223.jpg
This document is page 14 of a court order regarding a bail motion for a Defendant (identified by case number as Ghislaine Maxwell). The text analyzes the Defendant's flight risk in relation to her family ties, specifically discussing a letter of support from her spouse whose identity was initially withheld. The Court notes that while the spouse describes a 'quiet family life,' the Defendant was not living with him at the time of arrest, claimed to be getting divorced, and does not propose living with him if released, which undermines her argument that the marriage prevents flight.
DOJ-OGR-00001145.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing dated June 25, 2018, associated with case number 201cr7-00330-AJN. It lists numerous U.S. federal court cases cited as legal precedent, with decisions spanning from 1985 to 2019. The vast majority of the cases listed are criminal proceedings with the United States as the plaintiff against various individual defendants.
DOJ-OGR-00001136.jpg
This document is page 35 of a legal filing (Document 102) dated December 14, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. It contends that her proposed $28.5 million bond package exceeds necessary requirements for ensuring her presence in court. The document features a table comparing Maxwell's proposed bail conditions (including private security and electronic monitoring) to those of other high-profile defendants like Bernie Madoff and Khashoggi, highlighting that her package is stricter than those previously granted release.
DOJ-OGR-00001055.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding where a speaker is arguing for bail for a defendant. The speaker cites several precedent cases (Esposito, Madoff, Dreier, Deutsch, Conway, and Mattis) to demonstrate that defendants in serious cases, including organized crime, massive financial fraud, and violent acts, have been granted release on bail conditions and have consistently appeared for trial. The argument aims to persuade the judge that release on conditions is appropriate in the current case as well.
DOJ-OGR-00001052.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021. An attorney, Mr. Cohen, is arguing a point by citing past high-profile cases like Madoff, Dreier, and Esposito. The judge interrupts to question the relevance of these precedents, specifically asking if those defendants had substantial international connections, which distinguishes them from the current case. Mr. Cohen admits they did not, highlighting that the current defendant's foreign ties are a key point of contention.
DOJ-OGR-00002246(1).jpg
This legal document is a court's analysis of a defendant's motion for release, focusing on her ties to the United States as a factor in determining flight risk. The court considers letters of support from friends, family, and her spouse, but finds them insufficient to alter its conclusion that she remains a flight risk. The court highlights a key contradiction: the defendant now emphasizes her spousal relationship to argue she has strong ties, despite having claimed she was getting divorced at the time of her arrest.
DOJ-OGR-00002191.jpg
This legal document is a court filing from December 18, 2020, in which the Court reaffirms its decision to deny bail to a defendant. The Court rejects the defense's arguments, which cite precedents like the cases of Esposito, Dreier, and Madoff, by highlighting crucial factual differences, such as the current defendant's significant foreign connections and demonstrated sophistication in hiding financial resources.
DOJ-OGR-00002191(1).jpg
This legal document is a court filing arguing against a defendant's motion for bail reconsideration. The author contends that the defense is improperly relitigating issues already decided and that the precedent cases cited (Esposito, Dreier, Madoff) are factually different from the current case. The document emphasizes the Court's findings that the defendant has 'significant foreign connections' and has shown 'sophistication in hiding those resources and herself' as justifications for continued detention.
DOJ-OGR-00002164.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on December 18, 2020. It lists numerous U.S. federal court cases, dating from 1985 to 2019, that are cited as legal precedent in the main document. The cases cover various federal districts and circuits, with a significant number originating from courts in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00002012.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, argues for the approval of a proposed $28.5 million bail package for defendant Ms. Maxwell. It contends that this package is more than sufficient to ensure her appearance in court by comparing it to the less restrictive bail conditions of other high-profile defendants with significant financial means and foreign citizenships. A table is provided to illustrate these precedents, detailing bond amounts and conditions for defendants such as Madoff, Khashoggi, and others.
DOJ-OGR-00001965.jpg
This document is page 88 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on December 10, 2020, detailing the judge's rationale for denying bail to Ghislaine Maxwell. The court argues that Maxwell poses a significant flight risk due to her foreign connections and potential to evade monitoring, distinguishing her situation from other high-profile financial crime defendants like Madoff and Esposito. The page concludes with the defense introducing the COVID-19 pandemic as an argument for release.
DOJ-OGR-00001936.jpg
This document is a court transcript from December 10, 2020, where a defense attorney argues about their client's financial situation. The attorney disputes the government's claims, stating the client does not have wealth comparable to figures like Madoff or Dreier, and criticizes the government for arresting her just before a holiday and then questioning her financial disclosures.
DOJ-OGR-00001928.jpg
This document is page 51 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 10, 2020. The text captures an oral argument by the defense counsel advocating for the defendant's release on bail by citing various legal precedents (Esposito, Madoff, Dreier, Deutsch, Conway, and Mattis). The argument highlights that defendants in cases involving organized crime, massive financial fraud, sex crimes, and even violence (Molotov cocktail) were previously granted bail under strict conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00001925.jpg
This document is a court transcript from December 10, 2020, where an attorney, Mr. Cohen, references past high-profile cases (Madoff, Dreier, Esposito) to support his arguments. The presiding judge questions the relevance of these precedents, specifically asking if those defendants had substantial international connections. Mr. Cohen concedes that they did not, highlighting a key factual distinction from the current case.
DOJ-OGR-00020090.jpg
This document is page 27 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on December 18, 2020. The text argues against the defense's motion for reconsideration of bail, stating the Court has already rejected comparisons to other high-profile cases (Esposito, Dreier, Madoff). The prosecution highlights the defendant's 'significant foreign connections' and 'sophistication in hiding those resources and herself' as reasons for continued detention.
DOJ-OGR-00020063.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a legal filing entitled 'Table of Authorities' from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on June 18, 2020. It lists numerous legal precedents cited in the filing, primarily 'United States v. [Defendant]' cases. Notably, the list includes two citations for 'United States v. Epstein' (one from 2001 in E.D. Pa. and one from 2019 in S.D.N.Y.) and one for 'United States v. Madoff'.
DOJ-OGR-00020141.jpg
This legal document is a court's analysis regarding a defendant's ties to the United States, likely in the context of a bail hearing. The court acknowledges letters of support from the defendant's friends, family, and spouse, which aim to prove her strong connections to the country. However, the court remains unconvinced that she is not a flight risk, highlighting a key contradiction: the defendant now emphasizes her spousal relationship as a significant tie, yet at the time of her arrest, she claimed to be getting divorced from him.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Madoff | Court | $10,000,000.00 | Comparative bond amount. | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity