DOJ-OGR-00013989.jpg
608 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (testimony)
File Size:
608 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of an expert witness named Loftus (Dr. Elizabeth Loftus) discussing the malleability of human memory, specifically how linguistic labeling (e.g., 'incident' vs. 'fight') can alter a person's recollection of events.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Loftus | Witness/Expert |
Providing direct testimony regarding human memory, suggestibility, and labeling.
|
| Unidentified Attorney | Interrogator (Q) |
Conducting direct examination of the witness.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by reporter's name (likely SDNY given the case number context for Ghislaine Maxwell).
|
Relationships (1)
Q/A format in transcript header 'Loftus - direct'
Key Quotes (4)
"If it got labeled as dumbbells, people later remembered it as looking more like dumbbells."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013989.jpg
Quote #1
"label something ambiguous and it will affect people's memory for what they saw."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013989.jpg
Quote #2
"labeling something as an incident... has a different affect than when you label the thing that happened as a fight."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013989.jpg
Quote #3
"People are more likely to construct an image of a fight, probably because of that label."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013989.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document