DOJ-OGR-00013296.jpg
574 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
574 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal argument between attorney Ms. Sternheim and the Judge regarding the admissibility of information on an insurance form, specifically whether listing family members constitutes hearsay. The discussion references the 'Lieberman' case precedent regarding business records and verification procedures.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Arguing regarding the admissibility of hearsay evidence within an insurance form.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, ruling on the admissibility of evidence based on the Lieberman case precedent.
|
| Unnamed Witness | Witness |
Described by Ms. Sternheim as lacking personal knowledge of procedures from seven years prior to their employment.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting service listed in the footer.
|
|
| The Circuit |
Refers to the Court of Appeals (likely 2nd Circuit) regarding legal precedence.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction (SDNY) based on the court reporter's name.
|
Relationships (1)
Dialogue in court transcript.
Key Quotes (3)
"putting on the form who you wish to be insured as your family is hearsay."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013296.jpg
Quote #1
"It's content versus the form itself."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013296.jpg
Quote #2
"this witness does not have any personal knowledge as to what the procedures were seven years prior to her becoming employed."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013296.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document