DOJ-OGR-00010276.jpg
771 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal brief (defense reply)
File Size:
771 KB
Summary
This document is page 10 of a legal filing from March 2022 in the US v. Maxwell case. The defense argues that a Jury Note regarding Count Four indicates the jury was considering convicting Maxwell based on intent for sexual activity occurring in New Mexico, which the defense claims raises a 'constructive amendment' issue. The text disputes the government's interpretation of the note, accusing the government of inserting a comma to alter the meaning and downplay the jury's focus on New Mexico.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the jury's deliberations regarding Count Four and intent regarding sexual activity.
|
| Jane | Victim/Witness |
Person allegedly transported to/from New Mexico for sexual activity.
|
| The Government | Prosecution |
Argued that the Jury Note was ambiguous; accused by defense of altering text.
|
| The Jury | Adjudicator |
Sent a note asking clarifying questions about Count Four, intent, and location of activity.
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of alleged sexual activity and destination/origin of flights involving Jane.
|
|
|
Mentioned as a potential flight destination.
|
Relationships (1)
Discussion of Maxwell assisting with Jane's travel for the purpose of sexual activity.
Key Quotes (4)
"The problem raised by the Jury Note related to the jury’s other question about Ms. Maxwell’s intent."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010276.jpg
Quote #1
"The jury was asking whether they could convict on Count Four if they found that Ms. Maxwell’s intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity in New Mexico."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010276.jpg
Quote #2
"... the flight to New Mexico where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity ..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010276.jpg
Quote #3
"We note that the government inserted a comma between 'New Mexico' and 'where/if,' which does not exist in the Jury Note."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010276.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document