DOJ-OGR-00013986.jpg

641 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (direct examination)
File Size: 641 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of an expert witness named Loftus (likely Elizabeth Loftus), who is testifying about memory contamination, the difference between open-ended and leading questions, and the impact of stress on memory. The witness advises using neutral questions to avoid contaminating a witness's memory and notes that stress is usually relevant to the time of the event itself rather than the interview environment.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Loftus Witness
Expert witness testifying on direct examination regarding memory, interviewing techniques, and contamination.
Unidentified Attorney (Q) Interrogator
Attorney conducting the direct examination of Loftus.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
CIA
Mentioned by the witness in the context of lectures or consulting regarding interviewing techniques.
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
The court reporting firm listed in the footer.
DOJ
Department of Justice, indicated by the Bates stamp prefix 'DOJ-OGR'.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-10
Filing date of the court transcript document.
Court
Unknown (Testimony Date)
Direct examination testimony of witness Loftus regarding memory and interviewing techniques.
Courtroom
Loftus Attorney

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied jurisdiction based on the court reporter's name (likely SDNY given the case number context).

Relationships (1)

Loftus Consultant/Lecturer CIA
Testimony mentions talking about interviewing techniques to the CIA.

Key Quotes (4)

"CIA, I would be talking about interviewing techniques and other sources of potential post-event information that can contaminate memory."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013986.jpg
Quote #1
"Well, it's certainly open-ended questions give you, in some sense, more accurate information."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013986.jpg
Quote #2
"you would like to have them be as neutral as possible so that you don't contaminate the witness."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013986.jpg
Quote #3
"when you ask leading questions like how fast were the cars going when they smashed into each other, that's probably not a good way to follow up an open-ended question."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013986.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document