Unidentified Attorney (Q)
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 |
DOJ-OGR-00018139.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed Aug 10, 2022) of the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. The questioning focuses on allegations that Alessi entered Jeffrey Epstein's house looking for a gun, stole $1,900 from a briefcase, and returned on October 5, 2003, at 5:00 a.m. to steal more money. Alessi denies the specific theft details but admits to making a statement to the police at Mr. Epstein's request regarding the events.
DOJ-OGR-00018075.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. The testimony focuses on the layout of Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house, specifically noting that massage tables were present in every guest room and Epstein's room, and that Epstein received the majority of his massages in his bathroom. The witness also describes the protocol for answering phones and recording messages in a booklet with carbon copies.
DOJ-OGR-00018061.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records the direct examination of a witness named Alessi regarding his employment for Mr. Epstein between 1990 and 2002. The testimony focuses on internal 'directories' or booklets maintained by the organization, confirming they were updated approximately twice a year to add new employees and remove those who had left. The examiner introduces Government Exhibit 52 at the end of the page.
DOJ-OGR-00018001.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Direct Examination of a witness named Alessi) filed on August 10, 2022. The witness describes a visit to a massive ranch property owned by Mr. Epstein, detailing the layout which included cowboy quarters, a mobile home, and a huge Spanish-style main house situated on a mountain that was still under construction at the time. The witness mentions briefly touring the interior of the main house, specifically seeing the kitchen and what they believed to be Epstein's office.
DOJ-OGR-00017964.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio. The testimony focuses on the definition of 'grooming' in abuse cases, with Dr. Rocchio clarifying that grooming is not a single specific behavior but a 'series and a pattern of behavior' used to deceive a child and build trust for abuse. The questioning attorney attempts to establish that individual behaviors within that pattern can appear benign or non-grooming in isolation.
DOJ-OGR-00017931.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. The testimony focuses on expert definitions of 'coercive control' and its relationship to 'grooming,' specifically how positive reinforcements are interspersed with abuse to maintain victim attachment and entrapment. The witness explains how this psychological dynamic confuses victims of childhood sexual abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00017929.jpg
This document is page 56 of a court transcript (Document 747) filed on August 10, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). It features the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio, who is providing expert testimony on the risk factors associated with child abuse, specifically citing parental conflict, financial difficulties, prior parental abuse, and family isolation. The document bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00017929.
DOJ-OGR-00017907.jpg
This document is page 34 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio, a psychologist, who is establishing his credentials by detailing his leadership roles within the American Psychological Association (specifically the division of trauma psychology and ethics committee) and his state psychological association.
DOJ-OGR-00017904.jpg
This document is page 31 of 228 from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). It features the direct examination of a clinical psychologist named Rocchio. The witness testifies to having 30 years of experience specializing in traumatic stress and interpersonal violence, specifically treating 'hundreds upon hundreds' of victims of childhood sexual abuse, including teenagers and adolescents aged 12 and up.
DOJ-OGR-00017852.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Besselsen. Besselsen testifies about their oversight of the finance department at Interlochen and confirms the institution's business practices regarding the retention of records for major donors, including letters, emails, and call notes. The testimony establishes the foundation for admitting these donor communications as business records.
DOJ-OGR-00017788.jpg
This page contains a transcript from the cross-examination of a witness referred to as 'Jane' in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The questioning focuses on Jane's 20-plus year career as a soap opera actress, specifically listing dramatic plot lines her character has experienced, such as battling cancer, being bullied, and being stalked by serial killers. The line of questioning appears aimed at establishing the witness's familiarity with dramatic or fabricated narratives.
DOJ-OGR-00017755.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the cross-examination of a witness identified as 'Jane' regarding a specific claim form (Exhibit J-18). The questioning focuses on whether Jane participated in prosecution against Epstein, her confirmation of filing litigation against Epstein or his Estate (Question 11), and begins to address whether she was trafficked (Question 12). Jane admits to signing the form but notes she 'didn't write this.'
DOJ-OGR-00017737.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a cross-examination of a witness identified as 'Jane'. The questioning focuses on the late 2000s (2007-2008), establishing that Jane was aware of Epstein's arrest and investigation via the news but chose not to contact authorities at that time. It further establishes that Jane hired a lawyer only after seeing press coverage that mentioned her specifically.
DOJ-OGR-00015030.jpg
This document is page 154 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on January 15, 2025. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio, who is testifying about the scientific validity of reasons for false allegations, such as lying, intoxication, and psychiatric disorders. Rocchio states that while false allegations occur, they represent a very small minority of cases and notes a lack of specific scientific research linking the suggested factors as predictors.
DOJ-OGR-00015009.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. The testimony focuses on a scientific study regarding 'sexual grooming' and 'pre-offense behaviors,' specifically discussing methodology where 18 people were used to narrow a list of 77 items down to 42. The witness validates that the study in question established the content validity of a sexual grooming model.
DOJ-OGR-00015003.jpg
This document is page 127 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It captures the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio regarding the methodology of a social science study, specifically debating 'response rates' versus 'dropout rates' and the nature of an interview guide used on 22 expert subjects. The questioning attorney also makes a point about the definition and use of 'leading questions' during the testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00014996.jpg
This document is page 120 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell case). It features the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio (likely an expert) regarding academic studies on 'delayed disclosures' of abuse. The testimony distinguishes between 'disclosure' (to friends, parents, teachers) and 'reporting' (to law enforcement), and discusses how studies define 'delay' ranging from one week to one year.
DOJ-OGR-00014992.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on January 15, 2025. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio, focusing on the distinction between normal parenting behaviors (providing food, education, presents) and 'grooming.' The witness testifies that grooming requires a coercive or controlling context/intent.
DOJ-OGR-00014991.jpg
This document is page 115 of a court transcript (Document 782) filed on January 15, 2025, from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330). It features the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio, who is testifying about the clinical and legal definitions of 'grooming' versus 'normative behaviors.' The dialogue focuses on the necessity of 'intent to sexually abuse' to distinguish grooming tactics from normal relationship-building or parenting.
DOJ-OGR-00014990.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript involving the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio (likely an expert witness). The questioning focuses on the witness's academic or professional definition of 'grooming,' noting that while they haven't published a specific definition, they rely on common literature. The dialogue references a list of '77 specific behaviors' associated with grooming and debates whether intent and context determine if an act constitutes grooming.
DOJ-OGR-00014988.jpg
This page contains a cross-examination transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 15, 2025. A witness named Rocchio is being questioned regarding the definition and implications of 'vulnerable populations,' specifically regarding risks of sexual abuse, physical assault, substance abuse, and school drop-out rates. Rocchio pushes back against the attorney's broad generalization of risk, emphasizing specific research contexts regarding sexual victimization.
DOJ-OGR-00014984.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on January 15, 2025. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio, a psychologist, regarding the definition of forensic psychology versus therapeutic roles and the potential for 'dual roles' or boundary violations. The witness confirms they are testifying in a forensic capacity subject to APA guidelines and acknowledges reviewing a letter sent by the government on April 23rd that outlined their opinions.
DOJ-OGR-00014983.jpg
This document is page 107 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 15, 2025. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio, focusing on the independence of their investigations and the specific instructions given by the lawyers who hire them. The questioning seeks to establish the boundaries of the witness's independence when hired by a specific party in litigation.
DOJ-OGR-00014964.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio, likely a psychologist. The testimony focuses on the clinical reality that very few victims of childhood sexual abuse disclose the abuse immediately, with discovery often happening accidentally in younger children. The witness confirms this is consistent with their private practice experience.
DOJ-OGR-00014957.jpg
This document is page 81 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features direct examination testimony from a witness named Rocchio (likely an expert psychologist), explaining that studies show adolescents (ages 12-18) are statistically much more likely to delay disclosing sexual abuse until adulthood compared to other age groups. The witness attributes this to developmental stages where adolescents prefer confiding in peers rather than adults and desire to view themselves as competent.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity