DOJ-OGR-00019601.jpg
608 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal brief / court filing (appellate)
File Size:
608 KB
Summary
Page 10 of a legal filing (Document 69) dated September 28, 2020, in Case 20-3061. The text argues for the validity of an interlocutory appeal under collateral order jurisdiction, countering the government's claim that issues have not been finally resolved. It discusses the government's use of subpoenas to obtain evidence for a criminal case and Maxwell's challenge to the legitimacy of those methods within the context of a civil appeal.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Subject of the legal arguments regarding jurisdiction and appeals.
|
| Pappas | Case Citation Subject |
Referenced in a legal citation (United States v. Pappas) regarding interlocutory appeals.
|
| Salameh | Case Citation Subject |
Referenced in a legal citation (United States v. Salameh).
|
| Will | Case Citation Subject |
Referenced in a legal citation (Will v. Hallock).
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Prosecution/Appellee arguing against Maxwell's position.
|
|
| United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit |
Implied by citation '2d Cir.' and Case number format.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated by Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-09-28
Filing of Document 69 in Case 20-3061
Court of Appeals (likely 2nd Circuit)
Relationships (1)
Arguments presented in court filing regarding jurisdiction and subpoenas.
Key Quotes (4)
"Beyond standing for the proposition that interlocutory appeals are the exception and not the rule (which Ms. Maxwell doesn’t dispute), Pappas has nothing to add to the analysis here."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019601.jpg
Quote #1
"The balance of the government’s argument against jurisdiction misunderstands Ms. Maxwell’s position."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019601.jpg
Quote #2
"Ms. Maxwell’s argument, says the government, is “primarily focused on attacking the legitimacy of the Government’s methods of obtaining evidence that it intends to use to prosecute the criminal case through the Subpoenas to” the recipient."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019601.jpg
Quote #3
"the government claims that Ms. Maxwell “seeks to have this Court reach the merits of her arguments on that issue in the context of the civil appeal, and before they have been properly litigated before and adjudicated by the"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019601.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document