DOJ-OGR-00019498.jpg
714 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal correspondence / letter motion
File Size:
714 KB
Summary
This document is a letter dated July 27, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorneys (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense is requesting the entry of a protective order regarding discovery materials but outlines two remaining disputes with the government: 1) restrictions on government witnesses posting discovery materials to the internet, and 2) the defense's ability to publicly identify alleged victims who have already spoken on the public record.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant/Client |
Client represented by Cohen & Gresser, subject of the criminal case.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Recipient of the letter, Judge for United States District Court, SDNY.
|
| Mark S. Cohen | Attorney |
Sender, partner at Cohen & Gresser LLP representing Maxwell.
|
| Christian R. Everdell | Attorney |
Sender, partner at Cohen & Gresser LLP representing Maxwell.
|
| Alleged Victims/Potential Witnesses | Subjects of Discovery |
Individuals whose identities are a subject of dispute regarding public disclosure in the protective order.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Cohen & Gresser LLP |
Law firm representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Court jurisdiction.
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecution/Department of Justice.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-07-27
Filing of Document 29 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
New York, NY
Cohen & Gresser LLP
US District Court SDNY
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address of the recipient (Judge Nathan).
|
|
|
Address of the sender.
|
Relationships (2)
Letter states 'On behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell...'
Letter states 'On behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell...'
Key Quotes (3)
"Two key disputes remain, however, which require the Court’s guidance."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019498.jpg
Quote #1
"First, the defense believes that potential government witnesses and their counsel should be subject to the same restrictions as the defense concerning appropriate use of the discovery materials—namely, if these individuals are given access to discovery materials during trial preparation, they may not use those materials for any purpose other than preparing for trial in the criminal case, and may not post those materials on the Internet."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019498.jpg
Quote #2
"Second, the defense believes it should not be restricted from publicly disclosing or disseminating the identity of any alleged victims or potential witnesses referenced in the discovery materials who have already identified themselves by speaking on the public record."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019498.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document