Trove
Sign In Sign Up

MARK S. COHEN

Person
Mentions
320
Relationships
15
Events
65
Documents
157
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
15 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Client
24 Very Strong
47
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
8
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Professional
10 Very Strong
31
View
person Christian R. Everdell
Professional
10 Very Strong
5
View
person CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
Business associate
10 Very Strong
10
View
person Christian R. Everdell
Business associate
8 Strong
4
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Professional
6
1
View
person Bobbi C. Sternheim
Professional
5
1
View
person ALISON J. NATHAN
Legal representative
5
1
View
person CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Client
1
1
View
person Laura Menninger
Business associate
1
1
View
person Bobbi C. Sternheim
Business associate
1
1
View
person Bobbi C Sternheim
Business associate
1
1
View
person Assistant United States Attorney
Opposing counsel
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Arraignment, initial appearance, and bail hearing Southern District of New York View
2025-08-04 Legal proceeding A court order was issued granting the motion for attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Cohe... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2025-08-01 Legal proceeding A proposed order was filed granting the motion for attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Co... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-06-23 Legal filing Filing of a 'MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER RENEWED MOTION FOR BAIL'. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-03-30 N/A Filing of Notice of Appearance Court (Docket 21-770) View
2021-02-04 Legal filing Document 135 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. N/A View
2021-02-04 Legal filing Filing of a 'MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MS. MAXWELL’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS FIVE AND SIX ... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-01-25 N/A Filing of multiple motions by defense (Separate Trial, Dismiss Counts as Multiplicitous, Dismiss ... Court Docket View
2021-01-25 N/A Submission of Motion for Accelerated Disclosure New York, New York View
2021-01-25 Court filing Document 120 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. N/A View
2021-01-25 Legal filing Filing of a memorandum in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss counts one through fou... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-01-25 Legal filing Document 123 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. N/A View
2021-01-25 Legal filing A legal memorandum was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing for the dismissal of charges... N/A View
2021-01-25 Court filing Multiple motions and supporting memorandums were filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team, includi... U.S. Court View
2021-01-25 Court filing Filing of a memorandum in support of a motion to dismiss the superseding indictment against Ghisl... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-01-25 N/A Multiple motions filed by defense (Separate Trial, Dismiss various counts). Court View
2021-01-25 Court filing Document 122 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. N/A View
2021-01-25 Legal filing A memorandum was filed in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss either Count One or Co... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-01-25 Legal filing Filing of a Memorandum in Support of Motion for Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures in C... N/A View
2021-01-25 Court filing Document 121 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. N/A View
2021-01-25 Legal filing Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell submitted a request to the Court to strike all references to 'Acc... New York, New York View
2021-01-25 Legal filing Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel submitted a Notice of Motion to strike surplusage from the ... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-01-25 Legal filing Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel filed a Notice of Motion to dismiss the superseding indictm... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-01-25 Legal filing Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, through her counsel, filed a notice of motion for a bill of particul... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-01-25 Legal filing Filing of a Notice of Motion to dismiss the superseding indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View

21-770_Documents%20Pt%202%20of%203.pdf

This document is a compilation of legal filings from late 2020 to early 2021 concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's repeated attempts to secure release on bail pending her trial for sex trafficking conspiracy. It includes the Government's opposition detailing her flight risk, wealth, and foreign ties (specifically to France and the UK), a victim statement from Annie Farmer, correspondence from the French Ministry of Justice confirming they do not extradite nationals, and Judge Nathan's orders denying bail. The documents highlight Maxwell's offer to renounce her foreign citizenships and pledge significant assets, all of which the Court found insufficient to assure her appearance.

Legal case filings (memorandums, orders, exhibits, appellate notices)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

EFTA00032686.pdf

An email dated April 9, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding a new discovery production. The prosecution offers to send the files via FTP to the lawyers and notes that a CD with PDF-converted files (originally Excel) will be sent to the MDC for Ms. Maxwell to review.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00031952.pdf

This document is an email chain from December 4, 2020, involving defense attorney Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP and prosecutors from the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence concerns a draft letter regarding a briefing schedule to be sent to Judge Nathan in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The top email indicates approval of the draft ('Fine with me') from one of the recipients.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00030941.pdf

This document is an email thread between defense attorney Christian Everdell (Cohen & Gresser LLP) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). On December 28, 2020, Everdell requested a Bill of Particulars. On January 10, 2021, the USANYS responded with an attached letter regarding the request in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (indicated by 'GM' in the filename).

Email correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00030934.pdf

This document is a legal letter dated December 28, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Christian Everdell, to the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The letter formally requests a Bill of Particulars to clarify the allegations in the Superseding Indictment, specifically asking for the real names of Minor Victims 1-3, precise dates and locations of alleged grooming and sexual abuse, details regarding travel in 1996 (NM and FL/NY), and specifics concerning perjury allegations from 2016 depositions.

Legal correspondence / request for bill of particulars
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00030912.pdf

This document is an email chain from January 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding various discovery disputes. Key issues include Maxwell's inability to access files on a CD at the MDC prison, requests for unredacted FBI reports from 2006, missing subscriber info in AT&T records, and clarification regarding missing pages from flight logs produced by pilot David Rodgers. The prosecution responds that the 'missing' Rodgers pages were produced in a separate file (SDNY_GM_00005650-5676) and confirms that a Daily Beast article referenced a document unsealed by a New Hampshire court, not leaked by the prosecution.

Email correspondence / legal discovery dispute
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00030900.pdf

An email dated August 9, 2020, from attorney Jeff Pagliuca to redacted recipients and several cc'd attorneys (Menninger, Everdell, Cohen, Simmons). The email transmits an attached conferral letter regarding a protective order and discovery to the USA (likely US Attorney). The document originates from the Ghislaine Maxwell defense team (Haddon, Morgan and Foreman; Cohen Gresser).

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00030880.pdf

This document is an email chain from January 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and BOP/MDC officials. Sternheim urgently requests that time-sensitive legal mail delivered to the MDC be given to Maxwell immediately for review over the Martin Luther King Day weekend. She also requests that Maxwell be granted access to a government-provided laptop because standard MDC computers cannot open the necessary discovery documents, arguing that denial of access hinders Maxwell's defense. The BOP recipient responds that the legal department does not process mail and that BOP policies must be followed.

Email correspondence / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00030861.pdf

This document is an email chain and legal correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes in January 2021. Defense attorney Christian Everdell lists eight specific issues, including the urgent need for a hard drive for Maxwell to review evidence in prison, missing subscriber info for AT&T documents, and specifically noting that the first 27 pages of flight logs produced by pilot David Rodgers ('Rodgers000001-000027') were missing. The defense also inquires about a Daily Beast article referencing a cell-site simulator affidavit that they believe was not properly unsealed.

Email chain / legal discovery request
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00030083.pdf

An email from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding discovery production. The email confirms the production of materials related to victims not referenced in the specific indictment S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), pursuant to a court order from November 2020. The prosecutor requests an FTP link for transfer and notes that a CD copy will be sent to the MDC for Maxwell to review.

Email / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00030052.pdf

This document is an email header dated December 30, 2020, with the subject 'RE: Redactions'. It is addressed to Christian Everdell and copies several other attorneys known to represent Ghislaine Maxwell, including Mark S. Cohen, Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger. The sender information and specific email addresses are redacted.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029816.pdf

This document is a legal memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on January 25, 2021, seeking to suppress evidence obtained via subpoena from the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner. The defense argues that the government made false representations to Judge McMahon to bypass a civil protective order and obtain confidential deposition transcripts, alleging collusion between the civil plaintiff's lawyers (Boies Schiller) and federal prosecutors. The document details the history of the civil defamation case, specific deposition questions regarding sexual acts and Epstein, and the procedural history of the protective order modification.

Legal memorandum (motion to suppress evidence)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029600.pdf

An email from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email, dated September 15, 2021, transmits a government letter regarding 'Flatley' and a document labeled '3503-001', likely referring to Jencks Act material (witness statements).

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00027076.pdf

This document is an email header dated October 20, 2020, regarding 'US v. Maxwell - discovery production'. It is addressed to Christian Everdell and copies several other attorneys including Mark S. Cohen, Laura Menninger, Jeff Pagliuca, and Bobbi Sternheim. The sender is redacted, and the document appears to be part of the legal discovery process for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.

Email header / metadata
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00026464.pdf

This document is an email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated November 24, 2020, regarding the case 'U.S. v. Maxwell'. The email circulates a courtesy copy of an ECF filing titled 'Maxwell_Reply_to_90-day_conditions_ltr.pdf' to a group of attorneys including Mark S. Cohen, Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00026460.pdf

This document represents an email thread between defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim and an official at MDC Brooklyn regarding the confinement status of Ghislaine Maxwell on November 19, 2020. The official informs Sternheim that Maxwell was placed in quarantine (not the SHU) for 14 days after close contact with a staff member who tested positive for COVID-19, resulting in the suspension of in-person legal visits.

Email correspondence / legal communication
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00025508.pdf

This document is a series of emails from October 2020 concerning discovery production in the 'US v. Maxwell' case. The correspondence details the delivery and pickup of hard drives, the sending of Ms. Maxwell's drive to the MDC, and the scheduling of a prison visit for Ms. Maxwell to review a secure laptop. The emails involve legal teams from the Southern District of New York, Cohen Gresser, and HMFLAW, discussing logistical arrangements for evidence exchange and client access.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00024992.pdf

This document is an email chain from January 2021 involving defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim and government/MDC officials regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim urgently requests that time-sensitive legal mail delivered to the MDC be provided to Maxwell immediately for review over the Martin Luther King Day weekend. The correspondence also includes a request for Maxwell to have access to a government-provided laptop to review discovery materials, arguing that MDC computers are insufficient for her defense.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00024931.pdf

An email dated May 5, 2021, from Assistant US Attorney Lara [Redacted] to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The prosecutor is sharing a draft letter regarding 'flashlight checks' (as indicated by the attachment filename) pursuant to Judge Nathan's April 29 order, asking the defense to identify any necessary redactions of private medical information before the letter is publicly filed.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00024888.pdf

This document contains an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and BOP/MDC officials from January 2021. Sternheim asserts that Maxwell is being targeted, physically mistreated (specifically alleging a guard squeezed her breast during a search), and denied proper food (receiving rotting fruit and meat despite a non-flesh diet). The correspondence references Jeffrey Epstein's death in custody as a reason for heightened concern regarding Maxwell's safety and requests the removal of the current guard team.

Email correspondence / legal complaint
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00024887.pdf

This document contains email metadata from January 7, 2021, regarding Ghislaine Maxwell (referencing her inmate number 02879-509). The email was routed through the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP.GOV) system and addressed to her defense team, including Bobbi Sternheim, Christian Everdell, and Mark Cohen.

Email metadata / bureau of prisons record
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00024564.pdf

An email chain from July 6, 2020, coordinating a pretrial interview for Ghislaine Maxwell. An Assistant U.S. Attorney introduces Maxwell's defense lawyers, Christian Everdell and Mark Cohen, to a U.S. Pretrial Services officer to arrange the interview ahead of a bail hearing scheduled for that week.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00024562.pdf

This document is an email chain from July 6, 2020, between an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and U.S. Pretrial Services. The correspondence concerns arranging a pretrial interview for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell with her attorneys, Christian Everdell and Mark S. Cohen, in preparation for her bail hearing later that week. Pretrial Services confirms they will handle the request.

Email correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00024023.pdf

A formal letter from defense attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter lists twelve reply memoranda the defense intends to file in support of various motions, including motions to dismiss the indictment and suppress evidence. It also outlines the procedural handling of these documents, specifically regarding redactions of confidential information and filing under seal.

Legal correspondence / letter to court
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00023866.pdf

This document is an email dated August 6, 2020, sent to attorneys Christian Everdell and Mark S. Cohen regarding legal discovery. The sender attaches a zip file containing corrected documents. The majority of the document, including the previous email history and subsequent pages, is heavily redacted or marked as duplicate.

Email / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
13
As Recipient
0
Total
13

No Subject

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: Unknown

Email address mcohen@cohengresser.com is provided for attorney Mark S. Cohen.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Pretrial Motions

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Correspondence regarding pretrial motions.

Letter
2021-01-25
Communication Source

Pretrial Motions

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Regarding pretrial motions

Letter
2021-01-25
Communication Source

Pretrial Motions

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter regarding the filing of pretrial motions.

Letter
2021-01-25
Communication Source

Pretrial Motions

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter regarding pretrial motions.

Letter
2021-01-25
Communication Source

Regarding filing of motions and redactions

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: The Honorable Alison J...

Explanation of procedure for filing motions containing Confidential Information, including emailing unredacted versions to the Court and government for review before public docketing.

Letter
2021-01-25
Communication Source

Pretrial Motions

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter regarding pretrial motions.

Letter
2021-01-25
Communication Source

Notice of Appearance

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: all parties

Notice that Mark S. Cohen is appearing as counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell for specific hearings.

Legal notice
2020-07-08
Communication Source

Scheduling

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter regarding scheduling.

Letter
2020-07-06
Communication Source

Scheduling

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter regarding scheduling

Letter
2020-07-06
Communication Source

Scheduling

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter regarding scheduling.

Letter
2020-07-06
Communication Source

Scheduling

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter
2020-07-06
Communication Source

Scheduling

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Regarding scheduling.

Letter
2020-07-06
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search